Difference between revisions of "Ecfd:ecfd 9th edition"

From Extreme CFD workshop
Jump to: navigation, search
(Turbulence - L. Voivenel (CORIA), P. Bénard, (CORIA) & T. Berthelon (LEGI))
(T9 - LES-based aero-servo-elastic simulation of wind turbines - E. Muller (CORIA & SGRE), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE), B. Duboc (SGRE) & H. Hamdani (GDTech))
Line 78: Line 78:
 
The YALES2 library includes an advanced modular implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM). This approach remains state-of-the-art when performing an LES-based analysis of a wind turbine wake. The method also provides an accurate assessment of the aerodynamic loads applied on the turbine as well as the structural deformation when YALES2 is coupled to an external library/code. In the past years two coupling libraries have been developed, one to BHawC (SGRE certification tool) and one to OpenFast (NREL open access/open source tool). To improve the user and developer experience, a generalization and uniformization of the two coupling has been conducted in this project. Extensive tests and validations were performed to guarantee the non-regression.  
 
The YALES2 library includes an advanced modular implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM). This approach remains state-of-the-art when performing an LES-based analysis of a wind turbine wake. The method also provides an accurate assessment of the aerodynamic loads applied on the turbine as well as the structural deformation when YALES2 is coupled to an external library/code. In the past years two coupling libraries have been developed, one to BHawC (SGRE certification tool) and one to OpenFast (NREL open access/open source tool). To improve the user and developer experience, a generalization and uniformization of the two coupling has been conducted in this project. Extensive tests and validations were performed to guarantee the non-regression.  
  
The ALM and ADM (via ALADIN model) frameworks in the YALES2 code were thus enhanced to benefit from these couplings. Such method allows to take part of the external structural solver and controller for academic and industrial machines, in single and multiple turbines configurations.  
+
The ALM and ADM (via ALADIN model) frameworks in the YALES2 code were thus enhanced to benefit from these couplings. Such method allows to take part of the external structural solver and controller in single and multiple turbines configurations. Updates were also initiated directly in the coupling libraries to benefit from the latest developments made in the servo-structural solvers, thus allowing to simulate modern academic wind turbines (with OpenFAST) or industrial flagships (with BHawC) in operation.
  
 
Furthermore, works on the Risoe Dynamic stall model, initiated during ECFD6, have been achieved. The implementation and integration of this model has been continued, ported to the parallel-optimized ALM framework, and tested and validated on different configurations.  
 
Furthermore, works on the Risoe Dynamic stall model, initiated during ECFD6, have been achieved. The implementation and integration of this model has been continued, ported to the parallel-optimized ALM framework, and tested and validated on different configurations.  

Revision as of 11:35, 3 February 2026


Contents

Description

  • Event from 19th of January to 30th of January 2026
  • Location: Centre Sportif de Normandie, Houlgate, near Caen (14)
  • Two types of sessions:
    • common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points
    • mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below
  • Free of charge
  • Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome
  • The number of participants is limited to 80.
  • Organizers
    • Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA).


Logo ECFD9.png


News

  • 22/09/2025: First announcement of the 9th Extreme CFD Workshop & Hackathon !
  • 15/11/2025: Deadline to submit your project

Thematics / Mini-workshops

To be announced...

Projects

The projects will be selected after the end of the submission phase (end of November).

Numerics & User Interface - M. Bernard (LEGI), G. Lartigue (CORIA) & S. Mendez (IMAG)

N6 - Relaxation of the IBM stability constraint - PL. Martin (IMAG) & S. Mendez (IMAG)

Many simulations done in the YALES2BIO framework involve fluid-structure interactions handled with the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM). This model allows for the fluid/solid coupling, with the forces from the solid acting as a source term in the Navier-Stokes equations. In some cases for red blood cells simulations, and for most cases for von Willebrand Factor simulations, the governing time step is the force time step. When this is the case, we also notice artifacts in the fluid velocity and pressure fields. The robustness of our IBM implementation was improved for embedded surfaces by shifting our regularization/interpolation kernels away from the wall in case we work with an embedded solid. Since these simulations are done at low Reynolds and CFL number (0.01 - 0.001), the stability constraint was relaxed by doing substeps without: 1. advancing the convective velocity, 2. correcting the velocity to make it divergence-free. The artifacts showing when solids are a lot stiffer than the fluid viscous forces were reduced by projecting the regularized solid forces into a divergence-free space.


Turbulence - L. Voivenel (CORIA), P. Bénard, (CORIA) & T. Berthelon (LEGI)

T1 - Concurrent Precursor-Successor with Successor automated mesh convergence - P. Launay (CORIA), L. Voivenel (CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA)

T2 - Vorticity model for discharge-induced flow dynamics - S. Wang (EM2C), T. Kebir (EM2C), E. Roger (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA), V. Moureau (CORIA)

T3 - Discharge movement model for breakdown prediction - S. Wang (EM2C), T. Kebir (EM2C), E. Roger (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA), V. Moureau (CORIA)

T4 - Wind field reconstruction based on LiDAR measurements - T. Cousin (LMI), P. Benard (CORIA), G. Lartigue (CORIA), JB. Lagaert (LMO)

T5 – Hybrid RANS/LES based on dual mesh and LES of fluctuations - G. Balarac (LEGI), T. Berthelon (LEGI) & R. Letournel (Safran)

This project is devoted to a fully coupled hybrid RANS/LES strategy based on a dual-mesh framework, where the mean flow is solved by RANS on a mesh tailored for the mean field, while only the turbulent fluctuations are resolved by LES on a second mesh. In addition to deterministic drift (relaxation) terms that drive the resolved velocities in each model toward target fields provided by the other one (RANS mean for LES, LES statistics for RANS), a stochastic forcing built from RANS turbulent quantities is introduced in the LES of fluctuations. These combined forcing terms allow a controlled generation of fluctuations at the RANS/LES interface and reduce the sensitivity to interface location. Two-way coupling is achieved by feeding back the Reynolds stresses computed in the LES into the RANS equations in the resolved regions. The approach is demonstrated on turbulent pipe flows, including a fully coupled simulation at high Reynolds number (Re = 44,000), showing that the method enables wall-resolved hybrid simulations at a fraction of the cost of a full LES.

T6 - Injection of coherent structures for LES inlet condition - T. Berthelon (LEGI), G. Balarac (LEGI), R. Letournel (SAFRAN), P. Launay (CORIA), L. Voivenel (CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA)

T7 - Integration of a bending blade method with Dorothy - E. Mascrier (LOMC), M. Roperch (LOMC), A. Vergnaud (LOMC), G. Pinon (LOMC)

T8 - FSI-3D without deformation strategy for internal flows - P. Benez (SAFRAN), H. Lam (LEGI), P. Benard (CORIA)

T9 - LES-based aero-servo-elastic simulation of wind turbines - E. Muller (CORIA & SGRE), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE), B. Duboc (SGRE) & H. Hamdani (GDTech)

The YALES2 library includes an advanced modular implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM). This approach remains state-of-the-art when performing an LES-based analysis of a wind turbine wake. The method also provides an accurate assessment of the aerodynamic loads applied on the turbine as well as the structural deformation when YALES2 is coupled to an external library/code. In the past years two coupling libraries have been developed, one to BHawC (SGRE certification tool) and one to OpenFast (NREL open access/open source tool). To improve the user and developer experience, a generalization and uniformization of the two coupling has been conducted in this project. Extensive tests and validations were performed to guarantee the non-regression.

The ALM and ADM (via ALADIN model) frameworks in the YALES2 code were thus enhanced to benefit from these couplings. Such method allows to take part of the external structural solver and controller in single and multiple turbines configurations. Updates were also initiated directly in the coupling libraries to benefit from the latest developments made in the servo-structural solvers, thus allowing to simulate modern academic wind turbines (with OpenFAST) or industrial flagships (with BHawC) in operation.

Furthermore, works on the Risoe Dynamic stall model, initiated during ECFD6, have been achieved. The implementation and integration of this model has been continued, ported to the parallel-optimized ALM framework, and tested and validated on different configurations.

Miscellaneous tasks related to the ALM code pipeline coverage and documentation have been improved.

T10 – Numerical simulation of engine rotors - L. Bricteux (UMONS), G. Balarac (LEGI), Y. Bechane (CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA)

Combustion - Y. Bechane (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran) & S. Dillon (Safran)

C8 - Optimization of chemical source terms stiff integration - G. Lartigue (PI, CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA), K. Bioche (CORIA), Q. Cerutti (CORIA), M. El Moatamid (CORIA), M. Laignel (CORIA)

Integration of chemical source terms remains computationally expensive in configurations that rely on detailed chemistry approach. This project aimed to reduce that cost by (1) modifying the CVODE integration strategy and (2) applying source-term clustering. A first attempt was to modify CVODE’s internal step-size control strategy but it produced only minor gains as some unnecessary integration steps still occurred, mainly in the unburned gases region. This has finally been addressed by enforcing an initial step based on the CFD time step which reduced the computational cost by a factor 2 in these regions. More importantly, relaxing the relative and absolute tolerances used to determine the accuracy of the method reduced the computational cost by approximately 40% while introducing negligible error in physical properties and flame topology for a 1D premixed flame. These results were confirmed on three methane flame configurations: a 1D premixed flame, a 2D triple flame, and the PRECCINSTA burner. Numerical experiments on the PRECCINSTA burner show a reduction in integration cost by a factor of 2.5 using the adjusted CVODE strategy and by a factor of 4.4 when that strategy is combined with clustering.