<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vignyu</id>
		<title>Extreme CFD workshop - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vignyu"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Special:Contributions/Vignyu"/>
		<updated>2026-05-16T05:57:36Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.26.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=746</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=746"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:40:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=745</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=745"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:40:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=744</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=744"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:40:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**- WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)**&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=743</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=743"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:39:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=742</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=742"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:39:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=741</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=741"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:39:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=740</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=740"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:39:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 - WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 - WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 - WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=739</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=739"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:38:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
- WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=738</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=738"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:38:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
# WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
## WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
### WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=737</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=737"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:38:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
# WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=736</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 8th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition&amp;diff=736"/>
				<updated>2025-02-08T11:37:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow methodology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 8th edition, 2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD8.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD8 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''27th of January to 7th of February 2025'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.sport-normandie.fr/le-centre/le-site-de-houlgate Centre Sportif de Normandie], Houlgate, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* Participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry are welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* The number of participants is limited to 68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Voivenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd8.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_8th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acknowledgments_ecfd8.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/10/2024: First announcement of the '''8th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
* 22/11/2024: Deadline to submit your project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - A. Grenouilloux, ONERA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - M. Bernard, LEGI &amp;amp; G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7 -Implicit time advancement for low-Reynolds number flows with particles. S. Mendez, C. Raveleau (IMAG), M. El Moatamid, V. Moureau (CORIA)====&lt;br /&gt;
IMAG runs numerous simulations of red blood cells under flow. Those simulations are at low Reynolds number (0.001 to 1.0, typically). Splitting of the time advancement is used to treat the diffusion terms implicitly, albeit with an important numerical cost: implicit diffusion is 50 to 60% of the computational cost. Recently, M. El Moatamid implemented a genral framework to deal with implicit time advancement for scalars. In this project, the general method has been transposed to the advancement of the velocity field in the ICS and RBC solvers of YALES2/YALES2BIO. This enables testing various linear solvers (GMRES based). However, such solvers do not decrease the CPU time compared to the existing implementation. However, while working on this, it was identified that residual recycling was not activated in the current implementation of the implicit diffusion. This sped up the implicit diffusion cost by 35%, for a total gain of 20% for the computation. In addition to this achievement, moving to the framework coded by Moncef will have other beneficial side effects: we anticipate simplifying the implementation, with an easier merging between YALES2BIO and YALES2. The method will also be implemented in the electrosatic solver, for which the Poisson problem should benefit from the new GMRES-based solvers. In addition, this project highlights the importance of improving the treatment of stiff source terms in the red blood cells simulations, to be able to overcome the current limitation in time step due to those term and have a chance to benefit from higher-order time schemes, efficient at high Fourier numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - L. Voivenel, CORIA &amp;amp; P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1 - FSI-1D strategy for internal flows====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2 - Dynamic Smagorinsky in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3 - Turbulence injection strategy for compressible flows ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4 - Improve wind farm workflow ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5 - Improve atmospheric inflow turbulence ====&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric inflow turbulence is generated using the precursor database method. A half-channel flow driven by a pressure gradient is used to obtain the inflow which is used as inlet boundary condition for the wind turbine simulation domain. This project aimed to improve the whole methodology, from generation to injection.&lt;br /&gt;
WP1: Improve inflow generation&lt;br /&gt;
#Anand: pressure controller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WP2: Improve injection methodology (method A)&lt;br /&gt;
The previous workflow used plane probes in the ASCII format to sample the flow. The COWIT2 toolbox was used  to convert the file into turbulence box (.man format). While functioning, this methodology had two major flaws. First the probe files are heavy ~O(10Go). Second, the method requires a lot of human effort, allowing numerous sources of errors.&lt;br /&gt;
During this workshop, a new methodology has been developed. First, the probes are generated using the HDF5 format (now available for all probe types), leading to lighter file ~O(1Go). Second, Y2_tools is used to read HDF5 format (working for probes and temporals). HDF5 file is then converted into a Look-up Table. Finally, the Look-up Table is read directly by YALES2 as a boundary conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WP3: Improve injection methodology (method B)&lt;br /&gt;
#Etienne: CWIPI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6 - FSI model in Dorothy ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN &amp;amp; J. Carmona, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - Y. Bechane, CORIA &amp;amp; S. Dillon, SAFRAN &amp;amp; K. Bioche, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1 - LES of the thermal degradation of a composite material ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C2 - Flame stabilization by NRP plasma discharge ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C3 - Extending and validating a generalized formalism of virtual chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4 - Turbulent combustion model for NOx prediction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5 - Towards 3D simulation of detonation combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C6 - Flame stabilitity of flame-holders within reheat conditions ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7 - Thermal radiation in oxyflames ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C8 - A first step toward hybrid CPU / GPU for reactive flow in YALES2 ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C9 - Soots numerical modeling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C10 - TECERACT : Tabulated chemistry generator for aeronautical combustion ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C11 - Exploring efficient tabulation strategies for detailed chemistry ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C12 - Dynamic sub-grid-scale modelling of multi-regime flame wrinkling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C13 - LES of a semi-industrial burner using a non-adiabatic virtual chemical scheme ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--  Masqué&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (CORIA), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=625</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=625"/>
				<updated>2024-02-06T10:51:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver - U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] : ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, IJNMF 2020, Bernard et. al''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (SafranTech), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver – U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran Tech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=624</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=624"/>
				<updated>2024-02-06T10:50:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver - U.Vigny (UMONS), L.Voivenel (CORIA), S.Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] : ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, IJNMF 2020, Bernard et. al''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (SafranTech), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver - U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran Tech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=623</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=623"/>
				<updated>2024-02-06T10:50:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] : ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, IJNMF 2020, Bernard et. al''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (SafranTech), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver - U.Vigny (UMONS), L.Voivenel (CORIA), S.Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran Tech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=593</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=593"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:22:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=592</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=592"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:22:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and température) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=591</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=591"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:21:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=590</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=590"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:19:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=589</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=589"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:19:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=588</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=588"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:18:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. NOW, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=587</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=587"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:17:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. NOW, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=586</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=586"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:14:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). During this workshop, two work-packages have been developed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. NOW, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=585</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=585"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:13:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). During this workshop, two work-packages have been developed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: the use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. NOW, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: wall la velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=583</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=583"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:11:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). During this workshop, two work-packages have been developed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: the use of the Variable density solver&lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. Now, the variable density solver, taking into account all thermal effects can be used and results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: wall la velocity filtering&lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=584</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=584"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:11:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric solver */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). During this workshop, two work-packages have been developed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: the use of the Variable density solver&lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. Now, the variable density solver, taking into account all thermal effects can be used and results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: wall la velocity filtering&lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=582</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=582"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T19:10:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* T4: Atmospheric model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver have already been developed in YALES2 to represents some its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). During this workshop, two work-packages have been developed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: the use of the Variable density solver&lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation in the incompressible solver. Now, the variable density solver, taking into account all thermal effects can be used and results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: wall la velocity filtering&lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, wall law were using local velocity, leading to some convergence error in atmospheric wall law. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity and temperature at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=581</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=581"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T17:55:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=580</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=580"/>
				<updated>2024-02-02T17:55:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Projects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== WIP N1: High-Order schemes for Navier-Stokes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) &amp;amp; G. Lartigue (Total Eneriges) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finite Volumes method.&lt;br /&gt;
Distinction between integrate and pointwise quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Spacial accuracy depend on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes, starting from integrated quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
Accurate evaluation of fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
OK inside the domain, but chalenging in case of boundary conditions : by definition non uniformity of the stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
BC on faces instead of nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the BC by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurate diffusif flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of inlet BC by integrating convective flux through each boundary-facelet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. In particular, we adopt it to simulate the effect of a DC field on a red blood cell. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane as well as the emerging stresses. From the point of view of implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stocked on the surface interact with quantities stocked on the grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2Dmembrane/3Dgrid connectivity. Advancement on this has led to the simulation of a charging, not moving spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High Order extrapolation. The latter has tested successful on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== T4: Atmospheric model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran Tech &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=521</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 6th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=521"/>
				<updated>2023-02-06T19:37:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 6th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th of January to 3rd of February 2023'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 60 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD6_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS &amp;amp; P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; M. Bernard, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-level domain decomposition method (DDM) for coupled systems of differential-algebraic equations (A. Quirós Rodrígues, V. Le Chenadec)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical approximation of multi-physics problems gives rise to complex linear systems, the solution of which leverages preconditioning techniques such as multi-grid or domain decomposition methods. This project aimed at coupling two Julia packages that being actively developed: a two-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for free-surface and two-phase flows (Flower.jl) on the other, and a Domain Decomposition package for Cartesian grids (DDM.jl). The decomposed matrix-vector product was optimised to reduce the overhead associated with halo exchanges. The implementation of a deflated Conjugate Gradient as well as one- and two-level Additive Schwartz Method were also completed and shown to significant reduce the number of iterations for inverting monolithic systems (i.e. without resorting to operator splitting), shown to be independent of the number of subdomains for constant property flows. Future work will focus on a further optimisation of the implementation for vectorisation and multi-threading, and extension of the deflation to generalised coarse spaces to support highly discontinuous transport properties (GenEO).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Ghost fluid method (GFM) for Electrodeformation (A. Spadotto , S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Leaky Dielectric Model, red blood cells (RBCs) are subject to a force which is proportional to the jump of the Maxwell tensor. This latter is a quantity scaling as the square of the electric field, which under the quasi-static hypothesis is defined as the gradient of the electrostatic potential. To work out the potential, an elliptic interface problem must be solved, taking into account the presence of the RBC membrane. The aim of the project was implementing the Ghost Fluid Method (GFM) to face the interface problem. Good results were obtained on unstructured meshes. Secondly, a gradient calculation was performed applying the Green-Gauss scheme, modified in the style of the GFM. Future work will focus on interpolation of the gradient field onto the membrane to get an estimation of the effort. Possibly, high-order schemes for the gradient calculation will be explored. In a second time, the effort calculation will be merged into an Immersed Boundary solver for the RBC dynamics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Optimization of the high order framework (HOF) for Navier-Stokes incompressible (M. Bernard, P. Bégou, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past years, a framework has been developed to improve the spatial accuracy of numerical schemes on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if the solution is more precise, the computational cost of the overall resolution of Navier-Stokes equations is large.&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, HOF becomes profitable only on thin meshes thanks to a better spatial convergence order.&lt;br /&gt;
The code has been analized with different analysis tools (MAQAO, Gprof, Scalasca).&lt;br /&gt;
The main time consuming routines have been identified and improved.&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, some algorithms have been refactors such that the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations has been speed-up by a factor 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Force coupling method (FCM) for particulate flows (C. Raveleau, S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The Force Coupling Method (FCM) allows the representation of particles in flows from 0 to finite Reynolds number based on a regularization of the multipole expansion for Stokes flows, providing enough particle resolution to match the exact Stokes flow away from the particle. This is done by using a Gaussian function to spread the singular forces over a domain whose size is derived from physical quantities of interest such as the settling velocity of a particle under gravity in Stokes flow and the particle radius. During the workshop, the first term of the multipole expansion (monopole) and the antisymetric part of the second term (antisymetric dipole) were implemented and validated against test cases from the litterature. The monopole was tested in the case of a particle held fixed against an incoming flow and the dipole was tested by applying a torque on a particle in a still fluid. In both cases, the velocity profiles matched the results from the litterature and approximated well the Stokes solution at a distance of about 1.5 radii from the particle center. It was also compared to the conservative immersed boundary method (CLIB solver) implemented in YALES2 for the monopole test case. Both methods give good results, although the FCM is able to predict the expected solution with a coarser mesh than CLIB. Cases where the particle moves are under investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Breaking limitations of the linearized implicit time advancement (T. Berthelon, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The explicit time advancement classically used in ics solver is limited by CFL constraint. In order to get ride of this constraint, an implicit time advancement method, based on the linearization of the convective term, has been recently developed.&lt;br /&gt;
However, the method is limited by difficulties to solve linear system, with the BiCGSTAB2 algorithm, during the prediction step. The objective of this project was to understand these limitations. The correction of a bug on the boundary conditions (viscosity imposed at zero) was identified. In addition, the spatial scheme and the presence of a buffer zone at the end of the domain showed a great influence on the convergence of the prediction. The perspectives for a more robust and efficient use of this temporal integration consist in working on the spatial schemes and on the pre-conditioning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Development of a traction open boundary condition (TOBC) in Yales2 (J.B. Lagaert, Guillaume Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Development of new spatial differential operators in Yales2 (M. Bernard, G. Lartigue)&lt;br /&gt;
It exists different philosophies for computing differential operators on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
In a HPC context, the 2 main approaches are the Green-Gauss operators and the Least-Squares operators.&lt;br /&gt;
During ECFD#6, 2 new types of &amp;quot;non-compact&amp;quot; Hessian operators have been implemented by computing successively the gradient operator, eather with Green-Gauss gradient, or with Least-Squares gradient.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators lead to good convergence order, even on distorted mehes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, their application on low-resolution signals lead to large error magnitude due to their extended stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
Another pair of gradient &amp;amp; hessian Least-Squares operators have been implemented, leading to 2nd and 1st order accuracy for the gradient and hessian respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators have very interesting characteristics as their stencil is restricted to the direct neighbors only and their computational cost remains low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: DOROTHY optimization (M. Roperch, H. Mulakaloori, G. Pinon, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 9: Anamika, a tool to improve programming productivity (K. Mohana Muraly, G. Staffelbach)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Explore hybrid RANS/LES strategies (T. Berthelon, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For complex industrial applications, LES can still lead to a too long restitution time. In other hand, statistical approaches can lead too a lack of accuracy. In this project, the potentiality of hybrid approaches combining both have been explored. Conventional hybrid RANS/LES approaches consider a unique solution field, with an unique transport equation and a clusre terme modeled using RANS or LES models depending of the regions. The main idea is to evaluate a strategy based on a separation between mean fields and fluctuations with distinct coupled transport equations. First elements of validation using YALES2 code are shown that it was possible to correct the prediction of a RANS models, by performing LES of the fluctuations. Next steps should be to consider disctinct meshes, or even computational domains for RANS and LES with this strategy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Flow Instabilities over Rotating curved Surfaces (S. Sawaf, M. Shadloo, A. Hadjadj, S. Moreau, S. Poncet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For evaluating the effect of the clearance between the blade tip and the casing of axial ducted fans on noise emissions, LES offers excellent tool to capture the consitricted flow around the blade tip especially for small clearances where RANS fails because of unsteady flow conditions. LES simulation of the aerodynamics is the first step toward extracting accoustics data that helps to improve the design of axial ducted fans so they comply with the noise emission regulations in admistrative buildings. noise emmisions are estimated using analytical aeroacoustic models informed by data that are extracted from the LES simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Automatic statistical convergence metric (C. Papagiannis, G. Balarac, O. Le Maitre, P. Congedo)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics accumulation can be an important part of the restitution time in unsteady simulations (DNS/LES). In this project, the goal was to estimate uncertainties on the &amp;quot;finite time statistics&amp;quot;. For time correlated data, it can be shown that the variance of the mean estimator (i.e. the fluctuation of the estimation of the mean) is dependent of the correlation time. Modeling this correlation time based on the integral time scale of the turbulence appears as a first way to define a practical metric to evaluate the statistic convergence on-fly during simulations. Next step should be to explore procedures to  accelerate the statistics accumulation step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Aerodynamics of floating wind turbines (R. Amaral, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, E. Muller)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Floating wind turbines have the potential to unlock up to 80% of the wind energy located offshore making it a very strong candidate to mediate the energy transition. For this reason, many projects will soon come online with plenty of others entering the project phase. However, since now the foundation will experience translational and rotational movements, the rotor will experience changes in its local and global velocity fields whose effect is not well understood. This project intends to shed light on this matter, by making use of the high-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) and the actuator-line model (ALM) that are available in the YALES2 framework. This project will first cover floating wind turbines under user-prescribed motion to identify how the different degrees-of-freedom of the platform affect the rotor aerodynamics and in which proportion and will later move to more realistic conditions with sea-states described by a spectrum, turbulent wind and elastic turbine. During the ECFD workshop, we focused on finalizing some details of the prescribed motion implementation on the actuator-line model of YALES2 and well as preparing the implementation to be merged with the master branch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Implementation of the Risoe dynamic stall model for YALES2 (V. Maronnier, E. Muller, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: YALES2-OpenFAST coupling (A. Parinam, A. Viré, D. Von Terzi, B. Duboc, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Wall law for Immersed Boundaries &amp;amp; Rough surfaces (M. Cailler, A. Cuffaro, P. Benez, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. During the workshop, a brand-new data-structure for modular and generic immersed-body has been developed. This data-structure paves the way for various new capabilities for IB methods: penalization mask shape optimization for improved velocity imposition, better control of near wall discretization based on a reliable evaluation of wall units, wall-modeling, etc... For this purpose the periodic hill test case has been considered. Simulations of this configuration has been performed by using body-fitted meshes, and CLIB for both smooth and rough surfaces. This will allow to assess the accuracy of the IB methods, and will constitute a database for IB models improvement, and the development of wall-modeling strategies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: Atmospheric flow (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, P. Benard, S. Zeoli)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric flow such as Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) and thermal stratification have an impact on wind turbines aerodynamic and wakes. Mostly at a wind farm scale, the change of wind turbine wake size and recovery can modify the global power production. During the workshop, the Coriolis force implementation has been validated through neutral case (where no thermal stratification i.e. no temperature gradient). It also allowed to validate the pressure forcing term, needed to drive the flow in a periodic box. YALES2 results showed a good agreement with other numerical and experimental results. Afterwards, the stable case (i.e. temperature gradient downwards) has been studied. A surface temperature as boundary condition has been developed. Yet, results are not as expected and further investigation is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Convergent computation of interface curvature (G. Ghigliotti, M. Benard, G. Balarac, J. Carmona, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Level-set distance evaluation through GPMM (Janodet et al., 2022) converges at order 2, the interface curvature convergence is as best 0 using the non-compact Goldman formulation. &lt;br /&gt;
Following progresses obtained during ECFD5, a strategy based on parabolic fit of the interface has been explored during the workshhop. This method aims at fitting a parabola through least squares  using the interface markers stored in the interface vicinity. First the method was applied on a 2-D perfectly spherical droplet with exact projection of the marker on the circle. This results in a first order convergent curvature. Without projection of the markers, the fiting strategy allows a slight decrease of the error but no improve on the curvature convergence order in comparison with the standard non-compact formulation. As a persective, these results will be validated on dynamic and 3-D cases (MMG3D meshes). Also, the sensitivity on the number of markers and their redundancy will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-regime F-TACLES (S. Dillon, R. Mercier, B. Fiorina)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Filtered tabulated chemistry for large eddy simulations is currently a common tool to model premixed flames or diffusion flames. Tabulation using 1D counterflow flames, as a function of the mixture fraction and progress variable, was previously tested on laminar and turbulent cases.  It resulted in difficulties to describe the outer mixing zone and yield a very stiff evolution of SGS source terms in the phase space. The model was modified to include the mixture fraction scalar dissipation rate as a table dimension. This solves previous limitations, but using 1D counterflow flames yields empty table zones, making the method numerically infeasible. Tabulation using both 1D counterflow flames and 1D partially premixed flames gives well-built tables, and was tested on 1D flames for various strain rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Limiter model for turbulence combustion interaction in MILD combustion (E. Stendardo, L. Bricteux, K. Bioche)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MILD combustion yields intense turbulence and widespread reaction zones, requiring expensive mesh refinement over large areas. Practical mesh won’t be fine enough, leading to sub-grid heterogeneousness and effects of sub-grid turbulent fluctuations. A generic limiter type combustion model was implemented to solve for turbulence combustion interaction. This family of models includes Partially Stirred Reactor, Quasi Laminar Finite Rate and Laminar Finite Rate models. In these models, the source term is multiplied by a limiter factor and the residence time in inner cell reactive structure can be modelled. This implementation will permit testing the various limiter formulations in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Evaluate spatial discretization schemes on scalar transport (K. Bioche, Y. Bechane, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, J. Carmona, M. Bernard, L. Voivenel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common practice in combustion solvers is to use centred spatial schemes. Such low-dissipation schemes can prove unstable when applied to under-resolved scalar transport in presence of strong gradients. This is typically the case for H2/air combustion. Initial low-resolution simulations require thus adapted numerical schemes. Various spatial schemes were evaluated on the scalar transport problem, including: 4th order, 3rd order, 2nd order, WENO3, high order schemes, MUSCL schemes with various limiters (overbee, superbee, sweby, van leer, minmod). Their application to various configurations was discussed to emphasize on their robustness and accuracy. Tests cases include: 1D scalar convection Jiang Shu test case, 2D scalar bump convection for convergence analysis, a 2D reactive Bunsen burner and finally the 3D Preccinsta burner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Phenomenological plasma model for reacting systems (S. Wang, Y. Bechane, B. Fiorina)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plasma assisted combustion consists in stabilizing flames in near extinction conditions thanks to electric discharges. Stabilization of lean premixed flames with Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed electric Discharges is a strategy to reduce NOx emissions. Full 3D simulations of plasma assisted combustion are extremely expensive, so that the use of a semi-empirical strategy to model NRPD is preferred in CFD solvers. During the workshop, Castela’s model was implemented in a variable density solver. This model was extended to an explicit compressible solver. The model of Blanchard was also implemented in both frameworks. A 2D pin-to-pin configuration was successfully simulated with both models and frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Development and assessment of combustion in an explicit compressible solver (Y. Bechane, L. Voivenel, R. Mercier, K. Bioche)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of reactive physics in the Explicit Compressible Solver (ECS) of the YALES2 platform was undertaken. To this aim, reactive gases thermochemical functions were implemented. Specific schemes were developed to increase the temperature and species diffusion schemes from 2nd to 4th order. Finally, a 2D methane-air Bunsen flame was simulated with low order numerical schemes (RK1 and SLAU2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Clustering for finite rate chemistry using PCA (R. Mercier, A. Stock)'''&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the cost of species source terms computation, a clustering method was adopted. It consists in detecting nodes with similar properties and compute chemical source terms only once for these. Still, considering each species in this process creates a high dimensional cluster, while replacing species by a user-set progress variable may not well describe species. The strategy adopted here relies on the application of a PCA on species. It can be viewed as an automated “progress variable” creation. The use of such strategy was shown to reduce the simulation cost of source term computation by a factor 6 on a simple 2D flame ball case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience - J. Leparoux, Safran Tech &amp;amp; A. Pushkarev, GE Renewable Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: External coupling with CWIPI (R. Letournel, V. Moureau, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, P. Bégou, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Automated Grid Convergence refactoring (J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Advanced Liquid spray post-processing (J. Carmona, J. Leparoux, N. Gasnier, C. Brunet, I. El Yamani)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: YALES2 as industrial solver for GE design optimization tools (A. Pushkarev, H.  Lam, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: YALES2 History and Geography (T. Marzlin, A. Dauptain, P.  Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Improve the HT solver: refactoring of linear solver operators &amp;amp; Robin BC (C. Merlin, V. Moureau, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=497</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 6th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=497"/>
				<updated>2023-02-04T06:48:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 6th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th of January to 3rd of February 2023'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 60 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD6_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS &amp;amp; P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; M. Bernard, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-level domain decomposition method (DDM) for coupled systems of differential-algebraic equations (A. Quirós Rodrígues, V. Le Chenadec)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Ghost fluid method (GFM) for Electrodeformation (A. Spadotto , S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Optimization of the high order framework (HOF) for Navier-Stokes incompressible (M. Bernard, P. Bégou, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past years, a framework has been developed to improve the spatial accuracy of numerical schemes on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if the solution is more precise, the computational cost of the overall resolution of Navier-Stokes equations is large.&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, HOF becomes profitable only on thin meshes thanks to a better spatial convergence order.&lt;br /&gt;
The code has been analized with different analysis tools (MAQAO, Gprof, Scalasca).&lt;br /&gt;
The main time consuming routines have been identified and improved.&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, some algorithms have been refactors such that the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations has been speed-up by a factor 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Force coupling method (FCM) for particulate flows (C. Raveleau, S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Breaking limitations of the linearized implicit time advancement (T. Berthelon, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Development of a traction open boundary condition (TOBC) in Yales2 (J.B. Lagaert, Guillaume Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Development of new spatial differential operators in Yales2 (M. Bernard, G. Lartigue)&lt;br /&gt;
It exists different philosophies for computing differential operators on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
In a HPC context, the 2 main approaches are the Green-Gauss operators and the Least-Squares operators.&lt;br /&gt;
During ECFD#6, 2 new types of &amp;quot;non-compact&amp;quot; Hessian operators have been implemented by computing successively the gradient operator, eather with Green-Gauss gradient, or with Least-Squares gradient.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators lead to good convergence order, even on distorted mehes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, their application on low-resolution signals lead to large error magnitude due to their extended stencil.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Another pair of gradient \&amp;amp; hessian Least-Squares operators have been implemented, leading to 2nd and 1st order accuracy for the gradient and hessian respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators have very interesting characteristics as their stencil is restricted to the direct neighbors only and their computational cost remains low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: DOROTHY optimization (M. Roperch, H. Mulakaloori, G. Pinon, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 9: Anamika, a tool to improve programming productivity (K. Mohana Muraly, G. Staffelbach)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Explore hybrid RANS/LES strategies (T. Berthelon, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For complex industrial applications, LES can still lead to a too long restitution time. In other hand, statistical approaches can lead too a lack of accuracy. In this project, the potentiality of hybrid approaches combining both have been explored. Conventional hybrid RANS/LES approaches consider a unique solution field, with an unique transport equation and a clusre terme modeled using RANS or LES models depending of the regions. The main idea is to evaluate a strategy based on a separation between mean fields and fluctuations with distinct coupled transport equations. First elements of validation using YALES2 code are shown that it was possible to correct the prediction of a RANS models, by performing LES of the fluctuations. Next steps should be to consider disctinct meshes, or even computational domains for RANS and LES with this strategy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Flow Instabilities over Rotating curved Surfaces (S. Sawaf, M. Shadloo, A. Hadjadj, S. Moreau, S. Poncet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For evaluating the effect of the clearance between the blade tip and the casing of axial ducted fans on noise emissions, LES offers excellent tool to capture the consitricted flow around the blade tip especially for small clearances where RANS fails because of unsteady flow conditions. LES simulation of the aerodynamics is the first step toward extracting accoustics data that helps to improve the design of axial ducted fans so they comply with the noise emission regulations in admistrative buildings. noise emmisions are estimated using analytical aeroacoustic models informed by data that are extracted from the LES simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Automatic statistical convergence metric (C. Papagiannis, G. Balarac, O. Le Maitre, P. Congedo)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics accumulation can be an important part of the restitution time in unsteady simulations (DNS/LES). In this project, the goal was to estimate uncertainties on the &amp;quot;finite time statistics&amp;quot;. For time correlated data, it can be shown that the variance of the mean estimator (i.e. the fluctuation of the estimation of the mean) is dependent of the correlation time. Modeling this correlation time based on the integral time scale of the turbulence appears as a first way to define a practical metric to evaluate the statistic convergence on-fly during simulations. Next step should be to explore procedures to  accelerate the statistics accumulation step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wall law for Immersed Boundaries &amp;amp; Rough surfaces (M. Cailler, A. Cuffaro, P. Benez, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. During the workshop, a brand-new data-structure for modular and generic immersed-body has been developed. This data-structure paves the way for various new capabilities for IB methods: penalization mask shape optimization for improved velocity imposition, better control of near wall discretization based on a reliable evaluation of wall units, wall-modeling, etc... For this purpose the periodic hill test case has been considered. Simulations of this configuration has been performed by using body-fitted meshes, and CLIB for both smooth and rough surfaces. This will allow to assess the accuracy of the IB methods, and will constitute a database for IB models improvement, and the development of wall-modeling strategies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: Atmospheric flow (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, P. Benard, S. Zeoli)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric flow such as Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) and thermal stratification have an impact on wind turbines aerodynamic and wakes. Mostly at a wind farm scale, the change of wind turbine wake size and recovery can modify the global power production. During the workshop, the Coriolis force implementation has been validated through neutral case (where no thermal stratification i.e. no temperature gradient). It also allowed to validate the pressure forcing term, needed to drive the flow in a periodic box. YALES2 results showed a good agreement with other numerical and experimental results. Afterwards, the stable case (i.e. temperature gradient downwards) has been studied. A surface temperature as boundary condition has been developed. Yet, results are not as expected and further investigation is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=410</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=410"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T03:20:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=409</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=409"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T03:17:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=408</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=408"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T03:17:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature. Thus, it will be implemented for both velocity and scalar wall law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=407</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=407"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T03:16:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:\\&lt;br /&gt;
- The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
- A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
- The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
- The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
- The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature. Thus, it will be implemented for both velocity and scalar wall law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=406</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=406"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T03:15:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
- The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
- A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
- The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
- The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
- The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature. Thus, it will be implemented for both velocity and scalar wall law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=405</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=405"/>
				<updated>2022-01-31T02:54:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vignyu: /* Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vignyu</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>