<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cailler</id>
		<title>Extreme CFD workshop - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cailler"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Special:Contributions/Cailler"/>
		<updated>2026-04-09T01:35:18Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.26.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=650</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=650"/>
				<updated>2024-02-09T14:47:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* U2: Improved USEX for Multi-Scale Eulerian-Lagrangian simulation - L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (Coria) J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Viovenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, , Bernard et. al., IJNMF 2020''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2023''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N4: Non-uniform outlet pressure and coupling with CWIPI - J. B. Lagaert (LMO), Y. Lakrifi, T. Berthelon, G.Balarac (LEGI)  &amp;amp; R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In simulations, artificial boundaries need to be introduced due to the limited size of computational domains. At these boundaries, flow variables need to be calculated in a way that will not induce any perturbation of the interior solution. During ECFD#7, a generic outlet boundary condition defined from non-uniform pressure has been implemented in Yales2. This non-uniform pressure can de determined from a traction model (null or advected from the interior domain, for example). This non-uniform pressure can also be deducted through a coupling between two simulations. In this case a coupling via CWIPI is performed where the velocity and the pressure are exchanged at the common boundary to define the inlet and outlet conditions, respectively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7: Optimisation Dorothy  - M. Roperch &amp;amp; G. Pinon (LOMC), B. Gaston (CRIANN), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dorothy is a Lagrangian code using the particle vortex method. This method must have a homogeneous distribution of particles in space. To achieve this, at regular intervals during the simulation a Cartesian grid with new particles is created. The weights of the old particles are interpolated for each of the new particles. Before ECFD7, all the processors knew the general grid and the new particles. The aim of ECFD was to parallelize this module to avoid memory problem. To do this, each processor creates a grid corresponding to the particles it knows.  They then exchange data on the supperposition zones. This solves the issue because the quantity of new particles known is smaller. During ECFD7, a trial on a ring vortex case was successfully carried out to test domain communications and supperposition. The next step will be to implement this new method in the Dorothy code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (Safran), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2: Turbulence injection Compressible flows – P. Tene Hedje (UMONS),  J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA), L. Bricteux (UMONS) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turbulence injection for compressible flows remains a real challenge. Indeed, In these types of flow, the acoustic waves must also be controlled on boundaries. In addition, the non-reflective formulation of the Navier-Stokes characteristic Boundary Conditions (NSCBC) generally used in compressible solvers produce spurious pressure oscillations when applied to turbulent flows, making turbulence injection difficult for such applications. During the ECFD, two turbulence injection approaches were investigated and applied within the framework of the Explicit compressible solver (ECS) of YALES2. The first involved modifying the NSCBC formulation to inject turbulence from the inlet of the domain. To this end, the vortical-flow characteristic boundary condition [1] was implemented in ECS and the first validations were performed. The second was to use AL to generate a turbulence grid in the flow [2]. Future works will focus on further validating these approaches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''Guézennec et al., Acoustically nonreflecting and reflecting boundary conditions for vortcity injection in compressible solvers, AIAA journal, 47(7), 1709-1722, 2009.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] ''Houtin-Mongrolle et al., Actuator line method applied to grid turbulence generation for large-Eddy simulations, Journal of Turbulence, 21(8), 407-433, (2020).''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver – U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5: Implementation of the RVMs-WALE model in YALES2 – L. Bricteux (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6: Development of coupling between YALES2-OpenFAST – A. Parinam (TUDelft/CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T7: Confidence intervals for estimators – C. Papagiannis (LEGI), G.Balarac (LEGI), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P1: Level set reinitialization at the contact line for boiling flows - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Savinien Pertant's PhD thesis (2022), DNS of nucleate boiling at the bubble scale were performed, but suffered some lack of accuracy in the imposition of the contact angle.&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, the contact angle was not well respected, with a difference of around 10 degrees between the desired angle and the angle measured on the solution.&lt;br /&gt;
This lack of accuracy, that contrast with the accurate imposition obtained in the spray solver (SPS), is due to fluctuations of the contact line. This behavior that was traced back to the modifications of the level set reinitialisation needed to take correctly into account the triple line, and for which the solution applied in 2022 was to revert to the standard Janodet reinitialisation.&lt;br /&gt;
S. Pertant tested, at the very end of its PhD, a correction which nullifies the temperature transport term at the first node from the wall of the contact line. This correction was introduced to overcome an instability of the code when the contact line velocity on the substrate changes direction, from receding to advancing.&lt;br /&gt;
It turned out at the ECFD7 that this correction proves to be very efficient to stabilise the contact line for contact angles between 50 to 90 degrees even in the case of the use of the level set reinitialization. We were able to simulate nucleate boiling with a smooth contact line at the triple line and a precision in the angle of the contact angle of around +-0.5 degrees. More work remains to be able to run DNS of nucleate boiling for extreme contact angles (&amp;lt;50° and &amp;gt;100°). Moreover, longer runs will be needed to further confirm these results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P2: Compatibility of Boiling solver with PCS and MPH structure - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boiling solver does not work since the introduction of MPH data structure and PCS solver in March 2022. An investigation work was carried out to understand the changes made between the previous and the new version of the different solvers. A simple test case was created to show potential differences between the working version of the code and the new one. Several problems were spotted: the order of level set declaration became important as it is the first one declared which is advected. Sign convention was chosen differently for the mass transfer rate. The temporal discretization of the level set was different.&lt;br /&gt;
A test case with no flow and at an imposed mass transfer rate (i.e., no coupling of the level set with the temperature field) was run successfully and the results of the commit prior to the March 2022 modifications were retrieved. More work is needed to find the origin of the differences between the two solvers when the temperature field is solved and coupled with the level set and the velocity field. New common test cases for the two solvers will have to be implemented in order to cross-validate the results and avoid such cases happening again (i.e., cross-fertilization).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P4: vWF Unfolding - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P5: Towards even more efficient particle algorithms - M. Helal (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran), M. Cailler (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lagrangian particles are widely used in the YALES2 plateform to model: liquid spray, granular flow, two-phase flows with SPH approach or solids in IB method. &lt;br /&gt;
Though important developments to handle efficiently high number of particles in massively parallel simulations, the growing use of particles in Yales2 make necessary to re-evaluate and optimize the performances of Lagrangian particles algorithms handling.   &lt;br /&gt;
Objective of this project was twofold: analyze and improve the performance and robustness of the newly developed SPH solver of YALES2 and improve the performance of the Lagrangian particle relocation (identification of connectivity between Lagrangian and Eulerian grid) during the Dynamic Mesh Adaptation. &lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the first subject, profiling tools have been used to identify the hot-spots and bottle-necks in the SPH solver. Optimizations including code factorization, removal of string comparison allows to reduce the computational cost by a factor 3. Moreover, robustification of the solver was achieved.&lt;br /&gt;
In the second sub-project, a new implicit 4th-level decomposition has been introduced. This implicit decomposition consists in contiguous coloring of sub-el_grp in element group. The availability of smallest group of elements has been used to improve the local particle relocation algorithm that mainly relies on bounding-box comparison. This new relocation algorithm has been tested for various number of sub-el_grp on a representative case of gear lubrication showing a decrease by a factor 3 to 5 of the relocation algorithm. Perspective is to extend the use of sub-el_grp to the interpolation algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P6: Two fluid and phase change in PCS - C. Merlin (Ariane Group), J. Carmona (CORIA), V. Moureau (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P8: Wall liquid film numerical model - N. Gasnier (EM2C &amp;amp; Safran), J. Leparoux (Safran), J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P9: Casting simulation for the study of ceramic core displacement - S. Sirot, R. Mercier, M. Cailler (Safran), S. Meynet (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ceramic core displacement and deformation during the casting process is a major source of cooled blades manufacturing scrap. A possible source of core deformation may be the fluidic forces due to the filling of the mold with the liquid alloy. Predictive numerical simulations of the casting process would be an essential asset to increase the efficiency of the conception and industrial processes. During the workshop, a numerical methodology to simulate the filling process was drawn, with several modelling levels (with or without surface tension and slipping-wall conditions), in order to estimate the relevance of each of these models. Numerical results were then compared to available experimental results. Numerical deformation of the core was approximated as a beam flexion. Despite this post-processing approximation, the correlation between experimental measurements and numerical simulations is satisfying. The evolution of the core displacement with the inlet velocity of the fluid also has the same behaviour in the experiments and in the simulation. Future work will aim at including the dynamic contact angles in the simulations, in order to evaluate the relevance of this finer modelling, as well as correlating simulations with experiments on cases more representative of the industrial process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P10: Velocity regularization for Euler-Lagrange conversion - I. El Yamani (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran), M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5: Partially-Stirred reactor model for MILD combustion - E. Stendardo, L. Bricteux (UMONS), M. Laignel, K. Bioche (CORIA), J. Blondeau (VUB) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MILD combustion produces intense turbulence and extensive reaction zones, necessitating costly mesh refinement over large areas. Practical mesh lacks precision, leading to sub-grid heterogeneity and turbulent fluctuations. A Partially Stirred Reactor model was implemented to address turbulence-combustion interaction. This model multiplies the source term by a limiter factor, allowing modelling of residence time in the inner cell reactive structure. Testing various limiter formulations based on mixing and chemical timescales revealed increased computational costs. Future work aims to reduce costs by utilizing the model only where necessary. This ongoing research seeks to optimize performance while minimizing computational overhead for efficient application in engineering scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (Coria), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U2: Improved USEX for Multi-Scale Eulerian-Lagrangian simulation - L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (Coria) J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The multi-scale Eulerian-Lagrangian approach has now reached a certain maturity and is being used to simulate fuel spray atomization. Post-treatments of these multi-scale simulations require the development of specific tools that track liquid structures either described in an Eulerian or Lagrangian way. In this project, we implemented a strategy to register in a post-treatment particle-set all Eulerian droplets crossing an arbitrarily shaped surface (described with an interior-boundary). The strategy is based on artificial Eulerian droplet advancement (using a Lagrangian representation) and verification of the new Eulerian droplet position compared to the surface of interest. We used this strategy to build a new post-treatment that allows to track both Eulerian and Lagrangian structures and build particle size or velocity distributions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U3: Evaluate technological debt - P. Pouech, T. Marzlin, A. Dauptain (CERFACS) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U5: Integration of YALES2 in PRESTO supervisor - A. Pushkarev (GE Vernova), G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Graphical User Interface (GUI) exists at GE Vernova (Hydro) provides a user-friendly solution to perform numerical simulations for typical geometries of hydroelectric turbine in varied operation regimes. Previously, we implemented an interface for YALES2 code as alternative of CFX solver for this GUI client. Actual project is dedicated to implementation of the automatic mesh generation process for the runner section of the turbine using only section profile files of geometry such as blade profiles, meridional channel section, guide vane profile, etc... The algorithm should be able to generate a new *.msh mesh file once geometry profiles are updated as well as to setup standard named sections of the numerical domain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U6: Optimization of YALES2 compilation time - R. Mercier (Safran), G. Lartigue (Total Energy) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=648</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=648"/>
				<updated>2024-02-09T08:02:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* P5: Towards even more efficient particle algorithms - M. Helal (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran), M. Cailler (Safran) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
* Organizers &lt;br /&gt;
** Guillaume Balarac (LEGI), Simon Mendez (IMAG), Pierre Bénard, Vincent Moureau, Léa Viovenel (CORIA). &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, , Bernard et. al., IJNMF 2020''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2023''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N4: Non-uniform outlet pressure and coupling with CWIPI - J. B. Lagaert (LMO), Y. Lakrifi, T. Berthelon, G.Balarac (LEGI)  &amp;amp; R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In simulations, artificial boundaries need to be introduced due to the limited size of computational domains. At these boundaries, flow variables need to be calculated in a way that will not induce any perturbation of the interior solution. During ECFD#7, a generic outlet boundary condition defined from non-uniform pressure has been implemented in Yales2. This non-uniform pressure can de determined from a traction model (null or advected from the interior domain, for example). This non-uniform pressure can also be deducted through a coupling between two simulations. In this case a coupling via CWIPI is performed where the velocity and the pressure are exchanged at the common boundary to define the inlet and outlet conditions, respectively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N7: Optimisation Dorothy  - M. Roperch &amp;amp; G. Pinon (LOMC), B. Gaston (CRIANN), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dorothy is a Lagrangian code using the particle vortex method. This method must have a homogeneous distribution of particles in space. To achieve this, at regular intervals during the simulation a Cartesian grid with new particles is created. The weights of the old particles are interpolated for each of the new particles. Before ECFD7, all the processors knew the general grid and the new particles. The aim of ECFD was to parallelize this module to avoid memory problem. To do this, each processor creates a grid corresponding to the particles it knows.  They then exchange data on the supperposition zones. This solves the issue because the quantity of new particles known is smaller. During ECFD7, a trial on a ring vortex case was successfully carried out to test domain communications and supperposition. The next step will be to implement this new method in the Dorothy code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (Safran), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2: Turbulence injection Compressible flows – P. Tene Hedje (UMONS),  J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA), L. Bricteux (UMONS) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turbulence injection for compressible flows remains a real challenge. Indeed, In these types of flow, the acoustic waves must also be controlled on boundaries. In addition, the non-reflective formulation of the Navier-Stokes characteristic Boundary Conditions (NSCBC) generally used in compressible solvers produce spurious pressure oscillations when applied to turbulent flows, making turbulence injection difficult for such applications. During the ECFD, two turbulence injection approaches were investigated and applied within the framework of the Explicit compressible solver (ECS) of YALES2. The first involved modifying the NSCBC formulation to inject turbulence from the inlet of the domain. To this end, the vortical-flow characteristic boundary condition [1] was implemented in ECS and the first validations were performed. The second was to use AL to generate a turbulence grid in the flow [2]. Future works will focus on further validating these approaches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] ''Guézennec et al., Acoustically nonreflecting and reflecting boundary conditions for vortcity injection in compressible solvers, AIAA journal, 47(7), 1709-1722, 2009.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] ''Houtin-Mongrolle et al., Actuator line method applied to grid turbulence generation for large-Eddy simulations, Journal of Turbulence, 21(8), 407-433, (2020).''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver – U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5: Implementation of the RVMs-WALE model in YALES2 – L. Bricteux (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6: Development of coupling between YALES2-OpenFAST – A. Parinam (TUDelft/CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T7: Confidence intervals for estimators – C. Papagiannis (LEGI), G.Balarac (LEGI), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P1: Level set reinitialization at the contact line for boiling flows - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Savinien Pertant's PhD thesis (2022), DNS of nucleate boiling at the bubble scale were performed, but suffered some lack of accuracy in the imposition of the contact angle.&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, the contact angle was not well respected, with a difference of around 10 degrees between the desired angle and the angle measured on the solution.&lt;br /&gt;
This lack of accuracy, that contrast with the accurate imposition obtained in the spray solver (SPS), is due to fluctuations of the contact line. This behavior that was traced back to the modifications of the level set reinitialisation needed to take correctly into account the triple line, and for which the solution applied in 2022 was to revert to the standard Janodet reinitialisation.&lt;br /&gt;
S. Pertant tested, at the very end of its PhD, a correction which nullifies the temperature transport term at the first node from the wall of the contact line. This correction was introduced to overcome an instability of the code when the contact line velocity on the substrate changes direction, from receding to advancing.&lt;br /&gt;
It turned out at the ECFD7 that this correction proves to be very efficient to stabilise the contact line for contact angles between 50 to 90 degrees even in the case of the use of the level set reinitialization. We were able to simulate nucleate boiling with a smooth contact line at the triple line and a precision in the angle of the contact angle of around +-0.5 degrees. More work remains to be able to run DNS of nucleate boiling for extreme contact angles (&amp;lt;50° and &amp;gt;100°). Moreover, longer runs will be needed to further confirm these results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P2: Compatibility of Boiling solver with PCS and MPH structure - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The boiling solver does not work since the introduction of MPH data structure and PCS solver in March 2022. An investigation work was carried out to understand the changes made between the previous and the new version of the different solvers. A simple test case was created to show potential differences between the working version of the code and the new one. Several problems were spotted: the order of level set declaration became important as it is the first one declared which is advected. Sign convention was chosen differently for the mass transfer rate. The temporal discretization of the level set was different.&lt;br /&gt;
A test case with no flow and at an imposed mass transfer rate (i.e., no coupling of the level set with the temperature field) was run successfully and the results of the commit prior to the March 2022 modifications were retrieved. More work is needed to find the origin of the differences between the two solvers when the temperature field is solved and coupled with the level set and the velocity field. New common test cases for the two solvers will have to be implemented in order to cross-validate the results and avoid such cases happening again (i.e., cross-fertilization).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P4: vWF Unfolding - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P5: Towards even more efficient particle algorithms - M. Helal (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran), M. Cailler (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lagrangian particles are widely used in the YALES2 plateform to model: liquid spray, granular flow, two-phase flows with SPH approach or solids in IB method. &lt;br /&gt;
Though important developments to handle efficiently high number of particles in massively parallel simulations, the growing use of particles in Yales2 make necessary to re-evaluate and optimize the performances of Lagrangian particles algorithms handling.   &lt;br /&gt;
Objective of this project was twofold: analyze and improve the performance and robustness of the newly developed SPH solver of YALES2 and improve the performance of the Lagrangian particle relocation (identification of connectivity between Lagrangian and Eulerian grid) during the Dynamic Mesh Adaptation. &lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the first subject, profiling tools have been used to identify the hot-spots and bottle-necks in the SPH solver. Optimizations including code factorization, removal of string comparison allows to reduce the computational cost by a factor 3. Moreover, robustification of the solver was achieved.&lt;br /&gt;
In the second sub-project, a new implicit 4th-level decomposition has been introduced. This implicit decomposition consists in contiguous coloring of sub-el_grp in element group. The availability of smallest group of elements has been used to improve the local particle relocation algorithm that mainly relies on bounding-box comparison. This new relocation algorithm has been tested for various number of sub-el_grp on a representative case of gear lubrication showing a decrease by a factor 3 to 5 of the relocation algorithm. Perspective is to extend the use of sub-el_grp to the interpolation algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P6: Two fluid and phase change in PCS - C. Merlin (Ariane Group), J. Carmona (CORIA), V. Moureau (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P8: Wall liquid film numerical model - N. Gasnier (EM2C &amp;amp; Safran), J. Leparoux (Safran), J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P9: Casting simulation for the study of ceramic core displacement - S. Sirot, R. Mercier, M. Cailler (Safran), S. Meynet (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ceramic core displacement and deformation during the casting process is a major source of cooled blades manufacturing scrap. A possible source of core deformation may be the fluidic forces due to the filling of the mold with the liquid alloy. Predictive numerical simulations of the casting process would be an essential asset to increase the efficiency of the conception and industrial processes. During the workshop, a numerical methodology to simulate the filling process was drawn, with several modelling levels (with or without surface tension and slipping-wall conditions), in order to estimate the relevance of each of these models. Numerical results were then compared to available experimental results. Numerical deformation of the core was approximated as a beam flexion. Despite this post-processing approximation, the correlation between experimental measurements and numerical simulations is satisfying. The evolution of the core displacement with the inlet velocity of the fluid also has the same behaviour in the experiments and in the simulation. Future work will aim at including the dynamic contact angles in the simulations, in order to evaluate the relevance of this finer modelling, as well as correlating simulations with experiments on cases more representative of the industrial process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P10: Velocity regularization for Euler-Lagrange conversion - I. El Yamani (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran), M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5: Partially-Stirred reactor model for MILD combustion - E. Stendardo, L. Bricteux (UMONS), M. Laignel, K. Bioche (CORIA), J. Blondeau (VUB) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MILD combustion produces intense turbulence and extensive reaction zones, necessitating costly mesh refinement over large areas. Practical mesh lacks precision, leading to sub-grid heterogeneity and turbulent fluctuations. A Partially Stirred Reactor model was implemented to address turbulence-combustion interaction. This model multiplies the source term by a limiter factor, allowing modelling of residence time in the inner cell reactive structure. Testing various limiter formulations based on mixing and chemical timescales revealed increased computational costs. Future work aims to reduce costs by utilizing the model only where necessary. This ongoing research seeks to optimize performance while minimizing computational overhead for efficient application in engineering scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U1: Refactoring the YALES2 tools - J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (Coria), S. Meynet, L. Korzeczek (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U2: Improved USEX for Multi-Scale Eulerian-Lagrangian simulation - L. Voivenel, J. Carmona, I. El Yamani (Coria) J. Leparoux, M. Cailler (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U3: Evaluate technological debt - P. Pouech, T. Marzlin, A. Dauptain (CERFACS) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U5: Integration of YALES2 in PRESTO supervisor - A. Pushkarev (GE Vernova), G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U6: Optimization of YALES2 compilation time - R. Mercier (Safran), G. Lartigue (Total Energy) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=629</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 7th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_7th_edition&amp;diff=629"/>
				<updated>2024-02-06T18:16:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 7th edition, 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''22th of January to 2nd of February 2024'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 70 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd7.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:sponsor_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:agenda_ecfd7.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To come...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon GENCI - P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
The '''GENCI Hackathon''' will be devoted to porting two CFD codes to the Mi250 GPUs of the Adastra supercomputer deployed by GENCI at CINES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the '''YALES2''' code the goal is to obtain a first reference version giving the expected results then, if possible, to start its optimization to gain performance. The approach is OpenACC based with the objective of an implementation as least intrusive as possible in the existing code and which remains portable with the work done on the Nvidia GPUs of the Jean-Zay supercomputer at IDRIS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The porting of the '''AVBP''' code is more advanced with a prototype already functional on Adastra but &amp;quot;hard-coded&amp;quot;. The objective is to rationalize this first implementation, to integrate the latest developments in the code, to centralize memory management (host and device), to work on porting the Lagrangian part of the code and, of course, to improve the global performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Hackathon is supported by GENCI, HPE, AMD and CINES with the presence on site of several development experts on AMD GPUS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M1: ASMR for reheat chamber applications - Paul Pouech (CERFACS), Thibault Duranton, Luis Carbajal Carrasco (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combustion in reheat chambers feature a wide range of lenght scales. Mesh refinement is thus mandatory to capture the flow characteristics within a reasonnable CPU cost for LES computations using the AVBP code. The purpose of this project is to consolidate mesh refinement criteria and strategy in an academic reference case. The retained workflow is supported by the [https://lemmings.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme_copy.html Lemmings] code that calls the Tékigô wrapper for the mesh adaptations. During the ECFD7, the convergence time needed to have significant distribution of quantities of interest was analysed. An optimum runtime, based on a characteristic flow time-scale, was thus identified and led to a reduced running time for each adaptation step. As a second step, discussions with the ECFD7 participants led to the identification of interesting refinement criteria, namely the flame sensor or the mach rms for instance. Parametric analysis showed the robustness of the workflow based on a ponderation of different criteria. Finally, in order to facilitate the use of the workflow, efforts were made to improve the user experience by making it more human readable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== M2: Parallel remeshing - B. Andrieu, C. Benazet, K. Hoogveld, B. Maugars, E. Quémerais (ONERA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mesh adaptation is a crucial tool in order to automate industrial RANS numerical simulations. To meet this need, we need to carry out mesh adaptation as quickly as possible by setting up an efficient, parallel solution. To this end, we have explored two avenues: a parallel edge-splitting algorithm that has recently been initiated in the ParaDiGM library, and a solution based on [https://github.com/nasa/refine the refine library] for adapting meshes with MPI implementation. On the one hand, we fixed several bugs in our split operator, and validated it on test cases of increasing complexity with a node-centered solver. In addition, we've added interfaces to refine so as to avoid using files, and call directly in library mode. We also investigated geometric projection issues during the mesh adaptation procedure, notably by looking at solutions such as EGADS, which offers a simplified API for CAD interrogation. We finally implemented metric gradation (in serial), metric intersection and complexity computations. All the ingredients we've tested give us a clearer picture of the entire mesh adaptation process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N1: Treatment of boundary conditions for high-order schemes - M. Bernard &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI), G. Lartigue (Total Energies) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of Finite Volumes Method, spacial accuracy of a numerical scheme depends on ability to evaluate accurately fluxes through interface of each control volume (CV).&lt;br /&gt;
Such accurate evaluation is not straightforward, especially when dealing with distorted grids.&lt;br /&gt;
This project follows the work of [1] where fluxes use pointwise quantities, which are reconstructed from integrated quantities advanced in time.&lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, task force was dedicated to the treatment of **inlet** boundary conditions (BC) and **non-planar walls**.&lt;br /&gt;
For inlet BC, the key resides in the spatial integration of convective flux over discrete faces of the CV touching the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
Such treatment lead to exact integration for linear inlet profile and large error reduction on other profiles.&lt;br /&gt;
Concerning non-planar walls, the strategy adopted consists in the enforcement of the BC on each discrete face, by modifying the normal component of the wall gradient in order to evaluate accurately the diffusive flux.&lt;br /&gt;
Again, a large reduction of this error has been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] : ''A framework to perform high-order deconvolution for finite-volume method on simplicial meshes, IJNMF 2020, Bernard et. al''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N2: Implementation of linearised implicit time integration in ALE solver - T. Berthelon &amp;amp; G. Balarac (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An linearised implicit time integration has recently been developed in the incompressible solver of YALES2. This new integration scheme allows to use larger time-step that the ones constraints by classic stability criteria inherent to explicit time integration method. This allows to reduce the restitution time of Large Eddy Simulations [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to implement this new time integration in the ale solver in order to be able to reduce restitution time of moving mesh configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The developments were validated on a scalar advection case and on a rotor-stator interaction case. Although the results seem to be in line with the explicit integration methods, the validation of the temporal convergence to 2nd order remains to be shown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Toward the use of LES for industrial complex geometries. Part II: Reduce the time-to-solution by using a linearised implicit time advancement, Berthelon et al., JoT, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N5: Optimization of the RBC solver - F. Rojas &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the study of blood diseases, the mechanical behaviour of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) is one of the most relevant effects to take into account in the numerical models but also in experimental setups. Our system of interest is the thin gap of a rheometer where RBC suspensions are placed to explore their properties. To interpret the experimental data, the simulations of large suspensions of RBC are required to determine the blood’s microstructure (spatial arrangement of cells) and its rheological properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, YALES2BIO’s RBC solver is capable to manage thousands of cells, but in order to approach closer to the experimental scales, we propose the characterisation and optimisation of its performance to reduce the computational requirements and increase the RBC’s number and domain sizes in our simulations. During the workshop a parametric study was carried out to obtain the strong and weak scaling. Studying the increase in the volume fraction allowed us to quantify how the cost of the simulation increases rapidly with the RBC’s number and identify which routines have the biggest impact on the performance. One conclusion is that the cost is spread of several routines, which makes code optimization more cumbersome. However, the amount of RBCs and RBC nodes duplicated over processors is identified as a key factor for performance. Indeed, as RBCs may interact with several partitions, it is duplicated as much as needed based on criteria of boundaing box intersections. However, the current criteria have been shown to be too loose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to limit the amount of work during the RBC processing, stricter criteria were introduced to avoid unnecessary calculations at the level of the nodes with a small gain in performance. On the other hand, much better results were obtained using cartesian partitioning to optimise the bounding box of each processor, reducing the involved RBC operations: this demonstrates that the performances of the RBC solver may be optimized by a stricter selection of RBC duplicates over processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We thank Ghislain Lartigue and Renaud Mercier for helpful discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== N6: Electrodeformation of red blood cells, extension to 3D and improved accuracy at membrane  - A. Spadotto &amp;amp; S. Mendez (IMAG), M. Bernard (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
The Leaky Dielectric Model is a popular framework to describe electric stresses over micro-scale membranes. We have adopted it to simulate the effect of a DC electric field on a red blood cell using the YALES2BIO solver. The goal of the project is to reproduce the electric charging process of the membrane, as well as the resulting stresses, which may yield to electrodeformation of the cell. From the point of view of the implementation, the grid is represented by a 2D surface mesh embedded in a 3D eulerian grid. The need to make variables stored on the surface interact with quantities stored on the Eulerian grid calls for a proper bidirectional 2D-membrane/3D-grid dynamic connectivity. The advancement of theis task during this ECFD has led to the first 3D simulation of a charging fixed spherical shell. Moreover, the estimation of grid variables on elements cut by the membrane has been improved thanks to a High-Order extrapolation. The latter has been successfully tested on 2D configurations. The project opens the way for a series of validation tests. In particular, future work will demand treatment of instabilities emerging in symmetrical configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T1: Wall Law for immersed boundaries – P. Bénez (CORIA), M. Cailler (SafranTech), S. Meynet (GDTech), J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. In order to study highly turbulent configurations, it appears necessary to implement wall law models adapted to this method. If we consider a non-moving immersed body, developing wall-law models in a conservative immersed boundary formalism presents numerous challenges related to the diffuse interface property of the solid and the continuous formulation of the penalty force. During the ECFD, a new formulation of the penalty force has been established to ensure the imposition of the wall shear stress across the immersed solid interface. A strategy based on the use of two near-wall level sets was implemented to estimate the wall shear stress from the LES fluid velocity field at a distance D from the solid interface. At the end of the ECFD, turbulent flat plate cases were set up to start the validation of the strategy implemented for a logarithmic wall law. Future works will focus on validating this strategy for fixed solids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T2: Turbulence injection Compressible flows – P. Tene Hedje (UMONS),  J. Carmona (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA), L. Bricteux (UMONS) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T3: Aero-servo-elastic simulations of wind turbines including atmospheric effects – E. Muller (SGRE), U. Vigny (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Aero-servo-elastic engineering solvers used in the industry (i.e., BHawC)  for structural response and power assessments are unsuited for wake simulations, as aerodynamic loads are usually derived from a BEM-like method. To tackle this, the YALES2 library was coupled (P11-ECFD3) to BHawC, the Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) in-house certification code for wind turbines. This allowed the investigation of neutral atmospheric conditions. This project aims to include stable and unstable atmospheric conditions into this coupling based on the development done in T4-ECFD7. Therefore, this project is divided into three work packages: &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 1: Adjustment and refactoring of the existing coupling library between YALES2 and BHawC. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 2: Rethink how turbulence is injected into the simulation (recycling in SGRE setup) to consider thermal and Coriolis effects. &lt;br /&gt;
Work package 3: Adapt how the blade forces are computed in the coupling to consider the resulting density fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T4: Atmospheric solver – U. Vigny (UMONS), L. Voivenel (CORIA), S. Zeoli (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
Wind turbines, bigger and bigger, are now influenced by atmospheric flows. An atmospheric solver has already been developed in YALES2 to represents some of its effects (Coriolis, veer, thermal stratification). In this continuum, the project has been divided into two work-packages. &lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 1: The use of the Variable density solver (VDS). &lt;br /&gt;
Before ECFD7, thermal stratification was taken into account using the Boussinesq buoyancy approximation within the incompressible solver framework. Now, VDS can be used, taking into account all thermal effect. Results are promissing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Work-package 2: Wall law velocity filtering. &lt;br /&gt;
Wall law are using velocity at the first grid node to compute wall shear stress. Before ECFD7, atmospheric wall law were using the local velocity, leading sometimes to convergence errors. Now a gather-scatter filter can be used to average velocity (and temperature) at first grid node.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T5: Implementation of the RVMs-WALE model in YALES2 – L. Bricteux (UMONS), P. Benard (CORIA), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T6: Development of coupling between YALES2-OpenFAST – A. Parinam (TUDelft/CORIA), P. Benard (CORIA), F. Houtin-Mongrolle (SGRE) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== T7: Confidence intervals for estimators – C. Papagiannis (LEGI), G.Balarac (LEGI), R. Letournel (SafranTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - M. Cailler, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P1: Level set reinitialization at the contact line for boiling flows - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P2: Compatibility of Boiling solver with PCS and MPH structure - H. Lam, M. Benard, G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P3: Blood platelets adhesion model - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medical devices in contact with blood (e.g. artificial valves) are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, but their thrombogenicity remains the main unresolved issue in their development. A numerical model of blood platelets is being constructed to help to understand the effect of microstructuration on the thrombogenicity of artificial surface. The Force Coupling Method (FCM) was previously implemented and allows the modelisation of ellipsoidal particle and their interaction with the surrounding fluid. During the workshop, the particle model was extended to include adhesive and repulsive interactions with walls or with other particles. The adhesive bonds are modeled with springs forming when the distance between a node of a particle surface and a node of the wall or another particle is smaller than a given threshold. The stiffness of the bond is increased after a given formation time to mimic the 2-step adhesion process of platelets to von Willebrand Factor. A Lennard-Jones potential was used to model the collision of particles. Future work will aim at generalizing these implementations for an arbitrary number of particles (currently only working for 2 particles) and ensuring the interactions are unaltered by the crossing of a periodic boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P4: vWF Unfolding - C. Raveleau, S. Mendez, F. Nicoud (IMAG) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P5: Towards even more efficient particle algorithms - M. Helal (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran Tech), M. Cailler (Safran Tech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P6: Two fluid and phase change in PCS - C. Merlin (Ariane Group), J. Carmona (CORIA), V. Moureau (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P8: Wall liquid film numerical model - N. Gasnier (EM2C &amp;amp; Safran Tech), J. Leparoux (Safran Tech), J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P9: Casting simulation for the study of ceramic core displacement - S. Sirot, R. Mercier, M. Cailler (Safran Tech), S. Meynet (GDTech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== P10: Velocity regularization for Euler-Lagrange conversion - I. El Yamani (CORIA &amp;amp; Safran Tech), M. Cailler (Safran Tech), L. Voivenel, J. Carmona (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C1: Plasma discharge models for reacting system - S. Wang, B. Kruljevic, B. Fiorina (EM2C), Y. Bechane (CORIA) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the expensive computational cost of Plasma-Assisted Combustion (PAC) full 3D simulations, the EM2C laboratory has developed phenomenological approaches to model Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed (NRP) plasma discharges in reacting flows (Castela 2016 &amp;amp; Blanchard 2023). As part of previous works and ECFDs, both models were implemented and validated in the Low-Mach number framework (YALES2-VDS). While they were also implemented in the Compressible framework (YALES2-ECS), the validation against existing measurements or computations remained. During the workshop, numerical simulations of pin-to-pin configurations were performed with different numerical schemes and reactive mixtures to validate both models in ECS. The energy deposition was relatively well-validated through 2D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. CNF 2016 and Rusterholtz et al. JPhysD 2013. A glimpse of baroclinic instabilities was observed through 3D simulations in the conditions of Castela et al. PROCI 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C4: Developement of an automated virtual scheme generator for CFD - T. Luu, M. Hustache, N. Darabiha, B. Fiorina (EM2C) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reactive CFD simulations, a non-negligible part of the time cost is spent in the resolution of the chemical system. Simplified chemistry models aim to reduce the number of transported species while still ensuring a correct representation of the phenomena of interest. Among them, the virtual chemistry method consists of using “virtual” species and reactions to reproduce detailed chemistry results through a mechanism of drastically smaller size. These “virtual” species and reactions are optimized to target quantities of interest such as temperature, laminar flame speed or pollutants. In practice, the optimization is done using a learning database composed of representative canonical reactive configurations computed with detailed chemistry. The objective of this project was to develop a tool to easily generate virtual schemes. The tool, named VISION (Virtual Scheme optimizatION), is currently able to both generate a user-defined database of wide reactive configurations and optimize a given scheme structure using either CANTERA or REGATH.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C5: Partially-Stirred reactor model for MILD combustion - E. Stendardo, L. Bricteux (UMONS), M. Laignel, K. Bioche (CORIA), J. Blondeau (VUB) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MILD combustion produces intense turbulence and extensive reaction zones, necessitating costly mesh refinement over large areas. Practical mesh lacks precision, leading to sub-grid heterogeneity and turbulent fluctuations. A Partially Stirred Reactor model was implemented to address turbulence-combustion interaction. This model multiplies the source term by a limiter factor, allowing modelling of residence time in the inner cell reactive structure. Testing various limiter formulations based on mixing and chemical timescales revealed increased computational costs. Future work aims to reduce costs by utilizing the model only where necessary. This ongoing research seeks to optimize performance while minimizing computational overhead for efficient application in engineering scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== C7: High fidelity simulation of a cone calorimeter - A. Grenouilloux, K. Bioche (CORIA), N. Dellinger (ONERA), R. Letournel (Safran) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A methodology to simulate the decomposition of a composite sample in a calorimeter cone has been proposed. The configuration consists in the imposition of an incident radiative flux that heats the test coupon until it degrades. During test campaigns, the composite degradation can lead to the auto-ignition of the outgassed species, a phenomenon that needs to be predicted by the simulation. The variety of physical phenomena encountered, as well as the different characteristic time-scales, require the implementation of a coupled simulation. Hence, the proposed methodology relies on the coupling between two solvers of the massively parallel library YALES2 (fluid, radiation) and the MoDeThec solver developed at ONERA (solid degradation). First, a set of elementary validation tests to characterize the composite’s properties has been performed, showing good agreement with experimental data. A reduced three-equation kinetic scheme for the ignition delay has been derived, which aligns with experimental observations. Additionally, the framework for the coupled simulation involving the three solvers has been implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience &amp;amp; Data -  L. Korzeczek, GDTech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== U4: CWIPI 1.0 porting - N. Dellinger, B. Andrieu, K. Hoogveld, E. Quémerais (ONERA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA), R. Letournel (Safran Tech) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupling is a cornerstone of numerical simulation, especially for addressing multi-physics problems using highly-specialized solvers for each phenomenon. The CWIPI library, developed at ONERA for coupling codes in a massively parallel environment, has been used in YALES2 for many years for internal and external coupling.&lt;br /&gt;
Significant developments have been carried out in recent years to improve the performance and usability of CWIPI, resulting in the release of version 1 in july 2023. This version features a completely revised API to overcome the limitations of version 0.12 and offer more possibilities to users. &lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to support users in their transition to version 1. A training course based on Jupyter Notebooks was first organized. Assistance was then provided to successfully port MoDeTheC's and YALES2's internal couplings to the new version. Some fixes were made in CWIPI along the way, and will be reported in a new patched version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=528</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 6th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=528"/>
				<updated>2023-02-08T17:07:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 6th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th of January to 3rd of February 2023'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 60 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD6_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS &amp;amp; P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; M. Bernard, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-level domain decomposition method (DDM) for coupled systems of differential-algebraic equations (A. Quirós Rodrígues, V. Le Chenadec)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical approximation of multi-physics problems gives rise to complex linear systems, the solution of which leverages preconditioning techniques such as multi-grid or domain decomposition methods. This project aimed at coupling two Julia packages that being actively developed: a two-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for free-surface and two-phase flows (Flower.jl) on the other, and a Domain Decomposition package for Cartesian grids (DDM.jl). The decomposed matrix-vector product was optimised to reduce the overhead associated with halo exchanges. The implementation of a deflated Conjugate Gradient as well as one- and two-level Additive Schwartz Method were also completed and shown to significant reduce the number of iterations for inverting monolithic systems (i.e. without resorting to operator splitting), shown to be independent of the number of subdomains for constant property flows. Future work will focus on a further optimisation of the implementation for vectorisation and multi-threading, and extension of the deflation to generalised coarse spaces to support highly discontinuous transport properties (GenEO).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Ghost fluid method (GFM) for Electrodeformation (A. Spadotto , S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Leaky Dielectric Model, red blood cells (RBCs) are subject to a force which is proportional to the jump of the Maxwell tensor. This latter is a quantity scaling as the square of the electric field, which under the quasi-static hypothesis is defined as the gradient of the electrostatic potential. To work out the potential, an elliptic interface problem must be solved, taking into account the presence of the RBC membrane. The aim of the project was implementing the Ghost Fluid Method (GFM) to face the interface problem. Good results were obtained on unstructured meshes. Secondly, a gradient calculation was performed applying the Green-Gauss scheme, modified in the style of the GFM. Future work will focus on interpolation of the gradient field onto the membrane to get an estimation of the effort. Possibly, high-order schemes for the gradient calculation will be explored. In a second time, the effort calculation will be merged into an Immersed Boundary solver for the RBC dynamics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Optimization of the high order framework (HOF) for Navier-Stokes incompressible (M. Bernard, P. Bégou, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past years, a framework has been developed to improve the spatial accuracy of numerical schemes on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if the solution is more precise, the computational cost of the overall resolution of Navier-Stokes equations is large.&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, HOF becomes profitable only on thin meshes thanks to a better spatial convergence order.&lt;br /&gt;
The code has been analized with different analysis tools (MAQAO, Gprof, Scalasca).&lt;br /&gt;
The main time consuming routines have been identified and improved.&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, some algorithms have been refactors such that the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations has been speed-up by a factor 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Force coupling method (FCM) for particulate flows (C. Raveleau, S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The Force Coupling Method (FCM) allows the representation of particles in flows from 0 to finite Reynolds number based on a regularization of the multipole expansion for Stokes flows, providing enough particle resolution to match the exact Stokes flow away from the particle. This is done by using a Gaussian function to spread the singular forces over a domain whose size is derived from physical quantities of interest such as the settling velocity of a particle under gravity in Stokes flow and the particle radius. During the workshop, the first term of the multipole expansion (monopole) and the antisymetric part of the second term (antisymetric dipole) were implemented and validated against test cases from the litterature. The monopole was tested in the case of a particle held fixed against an incoming flow and the dipole was tested by applying a torque on a particle in a still fluid. In both cases, the velocity profiles matched the results from the litterature and approximated well the Stokes solution at a distance of about 1.5 radii from the particle center. It was also compared to the conservative immersed boundary method (CLIB solver) implemented in YALES2 for the monopole test case. Both methods give good results, although the FCM is able to predict the expected solution with a coarser mesh than CLIB. Cases where the particle moves are under investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Breaking limitations of the linearized implicit time advancement (T. Berthelon, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The explicit time advancement classically used in ics solver is limited by CFL constraint. In order to get ride of this constraint, an implicit time advancement method, based on the linearization of the convective term, has been recently developed.&lt;br /&gt;
However, the method is limited by difficulties to solve linear system, with the BiCGSTAB2 algorithm, during the prediction step. The objective of this project was to understand these limitations. The correction of a bug on the boundary conditions (viscosity imposed at zero) was identified. In addition, the spatial scheme and the presence of a buffer zone at the end of the domain showed a great influence on the convergence of the prediction. The perspectives for a more robust and efficient use of this temporal integration consist in working on the spatial schemes and on the pre-conditioning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Development of a traction open boundary condition (TOBC) in Yales2 (J.B. Lagaert, Guillaume Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Development of new spatial differential operators in Yales2 (M. Bernard, G. Lartigue)&lt;br /&gt;
It exists different philosophies for computing differential operators on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
In a HPC context, the 2 main approaches are the Green-Gauss operators and the Least-Squares operators.&lt;br /&gt;
During ECFD#6, 2 new types of &amp;quot;non-compact&amp;quot; Hessian operators have been implemented by computing successively the gradient operator, eather with Green-Gauss gradient, or with Least-Squares gradient.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators lead to good convergence order, even on distorted mehes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, their application on low-resolution signals lead to large error magnitude due to their extended stencil.&lt;br /&gt;
Another pair of gradient &amp;amp; hessian Least-Squares operators have been implemented, leading to 2nd and 1st order accuracy for the gradient and hessian respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators have very interesting characteristics as their stencil is restricted to the direct neighbors only and their computational cost remains low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: DOROTHY optimization (M. Roperch, H. Mulakaloori, G. Pinon, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 9: Anamika, a tool to improve programming productivity (K. Mohana Muraly, G. Staffelbach)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Explore hybrid RANS/LES strategies (T. Berthelon, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For complex industrial applications, LES can still lead to a too long restitution time. In other hand, statistical approaches can lead too a lack of accuracy. In this project, the potentiality of hybrid approaches combining both have been explored. Conventional hybrid RANS/LES approaches consider a unique solution field, with an unique transport equation and a clusre terme modeled using RANS or LES models depending of the regions. The main idea is to evaluate a strategy based on a separation between mean fields and fluctuations with distinct coupled transport equations. First elements of validation using YALES2 code are shown that it was possible to correct the prediction of a RANS models, by performing LES of the fluctuations. Next steps should be to consider disctinct meshes, or even computational domains for RANS and LES with this strategy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Flow Instabilities over Rotating curved Surfaces (S. Sawaf, M. Shadloo, A. Hadjadj, S. Moreau, S. Poncet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For evaluating the effect of the clearance between the blade tip and the casing of axial ducted fans on noise emissions, LES offers excellent tool to capture the consitricted flow around the blade tip especially for small clearances where RANS fails because of unsteady flow conditions. LES simulation of the aerodynamics is the first step toward extracting accoustics data that helps to improve the design of axial ducted fans so they comply with the noise emission regulations in admistrative buildings. noise emmisions are estimated using analytical aeroacoustic models informed by data that are extracted from the LES simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Automatic statistical convergence metric (C. Papagiannis, G. Balarac, O. Le Maitre, P. Congedo)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics accumulation can be an important part of the restitution time in unsteady simulations (DNS/LES). In this project, the goal was to estimate uncertainties on the &amp;quot;finite time statistics&amp;quot;. For time correlated data, it can be shown that the variance of the mean estimator (i.e. the fluctuation of the estimation of the mean) is dependent of the correlation time. Modeling this correlation time based on the integral time scale of the turbulence appears as a first way to define a practical metric to evaluate the statistic convergence on-fly during simulations. Next step should be to explore procedures to  accelerate the statistics accumulation step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Aerodynamics of floating wind turbines (R. Amaral, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, E. Muller)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Floating wind turbines have the potential to unlock up to 80% of the wind energy located offshore making it a very strong candidate to mediate the energy transition. For this reason, many projects will soon come online with plenty of others entering the project phase. However, since now the foundation will experience translational and rotational movements, the rotor will experience changes in its local and global velocity fields whose effect is not well understood. This project intends to shed light on this matter, by making use of the high-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) and the actuator-line model (ALM) that are available in the YALES2 framework. This project will first cover floating wind turbines under user-prescribed motion to identify how the different degrees-of-freedom of the platform affect the rotor aerodynamics and in which proportion and will later move to more realistic conditions with sea-states described by a spectrum, turbulent wind and elastic turbine. During the ECFD workshop, we focused on finalizing some details of the prescribed motion implementation on the actuator-line model of YALES2 and well as preparing the implementation to be merged with the master branch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Implementation of the Risoe dynamic stall model for YALES2 (V. Maronnier, E. Muller, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dynamic loads must be predicted accurately to estimate the fatigue life of wind turbines operating in turbulent wind conditions. Dynamic stall has a huge impact on these loads. A semi-empirical Beddoes-Leishman type model is formulated to represent the unsteady lift, drag, and pitching moment. The so called RISOE dynamic stall model follows the initial formulation presented in (Hansen et al. 2004) with improvements described in (Pirrung et al. 2018).  This model considers impulsive and circulatory terms in attached flow, and trailing edge separation in stall regions while in the Oye model only the lift coefficient was corrected in detached flow. This model will be implemented in the actuator line model in YALES2 and will be validated against experimental wind tunnel data for single airfoils (FFA-W3-241 and NACA0015). Simulations for a real wind turbine will be performed to estimate the impact of this model on loads into the coupling with the aeroelastic code BHawC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  Hansen, M.H., M. Gaunaa, and H.A. Madsen. “A Beddoes-Leishman Type Dynamic Stall Model in Sate-Space and Indicial Formulations.” Risoe, 2004&lt;br /&gt;
  Pirrung, G. R., and M. Gaunaa. “Dynamic Stall Model Modifications to Improve the Modeling of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines.” DTU Wind Energy, June 2018&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: YALES2-OpenFAST coupling (A. Parinam, A. Viré, D. Von Terzi, B. Duboc, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Wall law for Immersed Boundaries &amp;amp; Rough surfaces (M. Cailler, A. Cuffaro, P. Benez, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. During the workshop, a brand-new data-structure for modular and generic immersed-body has been developed. This data-structure paves the way for various new capabilities for IB methods: penalization mask shape optimization for improved velocity imposition, better control of near wall discretization based on a reliable evaluation of wall units, wall-modeling, etc... For this purpose the periodic hill test case has been considered. Simulations of this configuration has been performed by using body-fitted meshes, and CLIB for both smooth and rough surfaces. This will allow to assess the accuracy of the IB methods, and will constitute a database for IB models improvement, and the development of wall-modeling strategies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: Atmospheric flow (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, P. Benard, S. Zeoli)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric flow such as Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) and thermal stratification have an impact on wind turbines aerodynamic and wakes. Mostly at a wind farm scale, the change of wind turbine wake size and recovery can modify the global power production. During the workshop, the Coriolis force implementation has been validated through neutral case (where no thermal stratification i.e. no temperature gradient). It also allowed to validate the pressure forcing term, needed to drive the flow in a periodic box. YALES2 results showed a good agreement with other numerical and experimental results. Afterwards, the stable case (i.e. temperature gradient downwards) has been studied. A surface temperature as boundary condition has been developed. Yet, results are not as expected and further investigation is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Convergent computation of interface curvature (G. Ghigliotti, M. Benard, G. Balarac, J. Carmona, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Level-set distance evaluation through GPMM (Janodet et al., 2022) converges at order 2, the interface curvature convergence is as best 0 using the non-compact Goldman formulation. &lt;br /&gt;
Following progresses obtained during ECFD5, a strategy based on parabolic fit of the interface has been explored during the workshhop. This method aims at fitting a parabola through least squares  using the interface markers stored in the interface vicinity. First the method was applied on a 2-D perfectly spherical droplet with exact projection of the marker on the circle. This results in a first order convergent curvature. Without projection of the markers, the fiting strategy allows a slight decrease of the error but no improve on the curvature convergence order in comparison with the standard non-compact formulation. As a persective, these results will be validated on dynamic and 3-D cases (MMG3D meshes). Also, the sensitivity on the number of markers and their redundancy will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Phase Change Solver : towards pressurization &amp;amp; moving bodies (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, V. Moureau, I. El Yamani)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main objective of this sub-project was to extend the capabilities of the Phase Change Solver towards pressurization and coupling with the immersed-boundary method. During the workshop, the new and generalized data structure, proposed by F. Pecquery, allowing the treatment of n-phases whose properties are described by an equation of state has been validated by setting-up an aqat (mph_data_registration). Moreover, a new age Phase Change Solver based on this data-structure was implemented by adapting all numerical ingredients of the temporal loop : going from boundary treatment to velocity, phase indicator, data-set advancement and pressure evaluation. Perspectives of this work include extension towards multi-species treatment and derivation of n-velocities momentum conserving framework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Towards unity ratio between particle size &amp;amp; grid size (I. El Yamani, M. Helal, N. Gasnier, M. Cailler, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian framework, dedidated numerical treatment is necessary as soon as the ratio between the particle size and the cell size is greater than unity. In this configuration, in the best case the evaluation of the undisturbed velocity and drag force is inacurate, and in the worst situation the high local Eulerian source-term may lead to gas velocity divergence. During the workshop, a gaussian-based regularization of the Eulerian source term was implemented and tested on various test cases. Use of this regularization shows improvement on the particle trajectory description, but still some errors are obtained for low particle Reynolds numbers. To improve the accuracy of the strategy the model for undisturbed gas velocity prediction proposed by (Balachandar, 2019) was tested. Unfortunately some difficulties were encoutered regarding its numerical implementation. Next steps will include a thorough validation of the method on isolated and interacting particles test cases and identification of model parameter for the gaussian-filter size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, CORIA &amp;amp; R. Mercier, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-regime F-TACLES (S. Dillon, R. Mercier, B. Fiorina)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Filtered tabulated chemistry for large eddy simulations is currently a common tool to model premixed flames or diffusion flames. Tabulation using 1D counterflow flames, as a function of the mixture fraction and progress variable, was previously tested on laminar and turbulent cases.  It resulted in difficulties to describe the outer mixing zone and yield a very stiff evolution of SGS source terms in the phase space. The model was modified to include the mixture fraction scalar dissipation rate as a table dimension. This solves previous limitations, but using 1D counterflow flames yields empty table zones, making the method numerically infeasible. Tabulation using both 1D counterflow flames and 1D partially premixed flames gives well-built tables, and was tested on 1D flames for various strain rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Limiter model for turbulence combustion interaction in MILD combustion (E. Stendardo, L. Bricteux, K. Bioche)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MILD combustion yields intense turbulence and widespread reaction zones, requiring expensive mesh refinement over large areas. Practical mesh won’t be fine enough, leading to sub-grid heterogeneousness and effects of sub-grid turbulent fluctuations. A generic limiter type combustion model was implemented to solve for turbulence combustion interaction. This family of models includes Partially Stirred Reactor, Quasi Laminar Finite Rate and Laminar Finite Rate models. In these models, the source term is multiplied by a limiter factor and the residence time in inner cell reactive structure can be modelled. This implementation will permit testing the various limiter formulations in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Evaluate spatial discretization schemes on scalar transport (K. Bioche, Y. Bechane, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, J. Carmona, M. Bernard, L. Voivenel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common practice in combustion solvers is to use centred spatial schemes. Such low-dissipation schemes can prove unstable when applied to under-resolved scalar transport in presence of strong gradients. This is typically the case for H2/air combustion. Initial low-resolution simulations require thus adapted numerical schemes. Various spatial schemes were evaluated on the scalar transport problem, including: 4th order, 3rd order, 2nd order, WENO3, high order schemes, MUSCL schemes with various limiters (overbee, superbee, sweby, van leer, minmod). Their application to various configurations was discussed to emphasize on their robustness and accuracy. Tests cases include: 1D scalar convection Jiang Shu test case, 2D scalar bump convection for convergence analysis, a 2D reactive Bunsen burner and finally the 3D Preccinsta burner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Phenomenological plasma model for reacting systems (S. Wang, Y. Bechane, B. Fiorina)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plasma assisted combustion consists in stabilizing flames in near extinction conditions thanks to electric discharges. Stabilization of lean premixed flames with Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed electric Discharges is a strategy to reduce NOx emissions. Full 3D simulations of plasma assisted combustion are extremely expensive, so that the use of a semi-empirical strategy to model NRPD is preferred in CFD solvers. During the workshop, Castela’s model was implemented in a variable density solver. This model was extended to an explicit compressible solver. The model of Blanchard was also implemented in both frameworks. A 2D pin-to-pin configuration was successfully simulated with both models and frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Development and assessment of combustion in an explicit compressible solver (Y. Bechane, L. Voivenel, R. Mercier, K. Bioche)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of reactive physics in the Explicit Compressible Solver (ECS) of the YALES2 platform was undertaken. To this aim, reactive gases thermochemical functions were implemented. Specific schemes were developed to increase the temperature and species diffusion schemes from 2nd to 4th order. Finally, a 2D methane-air Bunsen flame was simulated with low order numerical schemes (RK1 and SLAU2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Clustering for finite rate chemistry using PCA (R. Mercier, A. Stock)'''&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the cost of species source terms computation, a clustering method was adopted. It consists in detecting nodes with similar properties and compute chemical source terms only once for these. Still, considering each species in this process creates a high dimensional cluster, while replacing species by a user-set progress variable may not well describe species. The strategy adopted here relies on the application of a PCA on species. It can be viewed as an automated “progress variable” creation. The use of such strategy was shown to reduce the simulation cost of source term computation by a factor 6 on a simple 2D flame ball case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User Experience - J. Leparoux, Safran Tech &amp;amp; A. Pushkarev, GE Renewable Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: External coupling with CWIPI (R. Letournel, V. Moureau, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, P. Bégou, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The coupling between different YALES2 solvers but also between YALES2 and an external code has been generalized. It relies on the CWIPI coupling library, which allows to interpolate the data exchanged on any mesh. By introducing a new dedicated data structure, several simultaneous couplings can be performed, on different boundaries or on volume domains. Keywords also allow to pre-process the data to be sent, by a spatial filtering or a temporal average in case of temporal desynchronization of the solvers (asynchronous coupling). Dedicated test cases have been added to the distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Automated Grid Convergence refactoring (J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Several grid convergence algorithms (Grenouilloux et al. (2022), Puggelli et al. (2022)) have been recently proposed but no one was fully embeded in the YALES2 solver which made the use of automatic mesh convergence tedious for users. A new data structure was introduced allowing to perform more easily grid convergence without to modify the fortran file of the YALES2 case. To go further, data structures state, event and action have been refactored allowing now to instantiate easily a new object (state, event or action) without previous user declaration. The next step will use these structures to propose an agile sequence that can be easily adapted. Dedicated test cases have been updated or added to the distribution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Advanced Liquid spray post-processing (J. Carmona, J. Leparoux, N. Gasnier, C. Brunet, I. El Yamani)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: YALES2 as industrial solver for GE design optimization tools (A. Pushkarev, H.  Lam, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: YALES2 History and Geography (T. Marzlin, A. Dauptain, P.  Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Improve the HT solver: refactoring of linear solver operators &amp;amp; Robin BC (C. Merlin, V. Moureau, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=500</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 6th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=500"/>
				<updated>2023-02-04T22:56:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 6th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th of January to 3rd of February 2023'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 60 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD6_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS &amp;amp; P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; M. Bernard, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-level domain decomposition method (DDM) for coupled systems of differential-algebraic equations (A. Quirós Rodrígues, V. Le Chenadec)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical approximation of multi-physics problems gives rise to complex linear systems, the solution of which leverages preconditioning techniques such as multi-grid or domain decomposition methods. This project aimed at coupling two Julia packages that being actively developed: a two-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for free-surface and two-phase flows (Flower.jl) on the other, and a Domain Decomposition package for Cartesian grids (DDM.jl). The decomposed matrix-vector product was optimised to reduce the overhead associated with halo exchanges. The implementation of a deflated Conjugate Gradient as well as one- and two-level Additive Schwartz Method were also completed and shown to significant reduce the number of iterations for inverting monolithic systems (i.e. without resorting to operator splitting), shown to be independent of the number of subdomains for constant property flows. Future work will focus on a further optimisation of the implementation for vectorisation and multi-threading, and extension of the deflation to generalised coarse spaces to support highly discontinuous transport properties (GenEO).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Ghost fluid method (GFM) for Electrodeformation (A. Spadotto , S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Optimization of the high order framework (HOF) for Navier-Stokes incompressible (M. Bernard, P. Bégou, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past years, a framework has been developed to improve the spatial accuracy of numerical schemes on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if the solution is more precise, the computational cost of the overall resolution of Navier-Stokes equations is large.&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, HOF becomes profitable only on thin meshes thanks to a better spatial convergence order.&lt;br /&gt;
The code has been analized with different analysis tools (MAQAO, Gprof, Scalasca).&lt;br /&gt;
The main time consuming routines have been identified and improved.&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, some algorithms have been refactors such that the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations has been speed-up by a factor 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Force coupling method (FCM) for particulate flows (C. Raveleau, S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Breaking limitations of the linearized implicit time advancement (T. Berthelon, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Development of a traction open boundary condition (TOBC) in Yales2 (J.B. Lagaert, Guillaume Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Development of new spatial differential operators in Yales2 (M. Bernard, G. Lartigue)&lt;br /&gt;
It exists different philosophies for computing differential operators on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
In a HPC context, the 2 main approaches are the Green-Gauss operators and the Least-Squares operators.&lt;br /&gt;
During ECFD#6, 2 new types of &amp;quot;non-compact&amp;quot; Hessian operators have been implemented by computing successively the gradient operator, eather with Green-Gauss gradient, or with Least-Squares gradient.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators lead to good convergence order, even on distorted mehes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, their application on low-resolution signals lead to large error magnitude due to their extended stencil.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Another pair of gradient \&amp;amp; hessian Least-Squares operators have been implemented, leading to 2nd and 1st order accuracy for the gradient and hessian respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators have very interesting characteristics as their stencil is restricted to the direct neighbors only and their computational cost remains low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: DOROTHY optimization (M. Roperch, H. Mulakaloori, G. Pinon, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 9: Anamika, a tool to improve programming productivity (K. Mohana Muraly, G. Staffelbach)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Explore hybrid RANS/LES strategies (T. Berthelon, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For complex industrial applications, LES can still lead to a too long restitution time. In other hand, statistical approaches can lead too a lack of accuracy. In this project, the potentiality of hybrid approaches combining both have been explored. Conventional hybrid RANS/LES approaches consider a unique solution field, with an unique transport equation and a clusre terme modeled using RANS or LES models depending of the regions. The main idea is to evaluate a strategy based on a separation between mean fields and fluctuations with distinct coupled transport equations. First elements of validation using YALES2 code are shown that it was possible to correct the prediction of a RANS models, by performing LES of the fluctuations. Next steps should be to consider disctinct meshes, or even computational domains for RANS and LES with this strategy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Flow Instabilities over Rotating curved Surfaces (S. Sawaf, M. Shadloo, A. Hadjadj, S. Moreau, S. Poncet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For evaluating the effect of the clearance between the blade tip and the casing of axial ducted fans on noise emissions, LES offers excellent tool to capture the consitricted flow around the blade tip especially for small clearances where RANS fails because of unsteady flow conditions. LES simulation of the aerodynamics is the first step toward extracting accoustics data that helps to improve the design of axial ducted fans so they comply with the noise emission regulations in admistrative buildings. noise emmisions are estimated using analytical aeroacoustic models informed by data that are extracted from the LES simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Automatic statistical convergence metric (C. Papagiannis, G. Balarac, O. Le Maitre, P. Congedo)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics accumulation can be an important part of the restitution time in unsteady simulations (DNS/LES). In this project, the goal was to estimate uncertainties on the &amp;quot;finite time statistics&amp;quot;. For time correlated data, it can be shown that the variance of the mean estimator (i.e. the fluctuation of the estimation of the mean) is dependent of the correlation time. Modeling this correlation time based on the integral time scale of the turbulence appears as a first way to define a practical metric to evaluate the statistic convergence on-fly during simulations. Next step should be to explore procedures to  accelerate the statistics accumulation step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wall law for Immersed Boundaries &amp;amp; Rough surfaces (M. Cailler, A. Cuffaro, P. Benez, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. During the workshop, a brand-new data-structure for modular and generic immersed-body has been developed. This data-structure paves the way for various new capabilities for IB methods: penalization mask shape optimization for improved velocity imposition, better control of near wall discretization based on a reliable evaluation of wall units, wall-modeling, etc... For this purpose the periodic hill test case has been considered. Simulations of this configuration has been performed by using body-fitted meshes, and CLIB for both smooth and rough surfaces. This will allow to assess the accuracy of the IB methods, and will constitute a database for IB models improvement, and the development of wall-modeling strategies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: Atmospheric flow (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, P. Benard, S. Zeoli)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric flow such as Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) and thermal stratification have an impact on wind turbines aerodynamic and wakes. Mostly at a wind farm scale, the change of wind turbine wake size and recovery can modify the global power production. During the workshop, the Coriolis force implementation has been validated through neutral case (where no thermal stratification i.e. no temperature gradient). It also allowed to validate the pressure forcing term, needed to drive the flow in a periodic box. YALES2 results showed a good agreement with other numerical and experimental results. Afterwards, the stable case (i.e. temperature gradient downwards) has been studied. A surface temperature as boundary condition has been developed. Yet, results are not as expected and further investigation is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Convergent computation of interface curvature (G. Ghigliotti, M. Benard, G. Balarac, J. Carmona, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Level-set distance evaluation through GPMM (Janodet et al., 2022) converges at order 2, the interface curvature convergence is as best 0 using the non-compact Goldman formulation. &lt;br /&gt;
Following progresses obtained during ECFD5, a strategy based on parabolic fit of the interface has been explored during the workshhop. This method aims at fitting a parabola through least squares  using the interface markers stored in the interface vicinity. First the method was applied on a 2-D perfectly spherical droplet with exact projection of the marker on the circle. This results in a first order convergent curvature. Without projection of the markers, the fiting strategy allows a slight decrease of the error but no improve on the curvature convergence order in comparison with the standard non-compact formulation. As a persective, these results will be validated on dynamic and 3-D cases (MMG3D meshes). Also, the sensitivity on the number of markers and their redundancy will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=499</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 6th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition&amp;diff=499"/>
				<updated>2023-02-04T22:55:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Projects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 6th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD6.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD6 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th of January to 3rd of February 2023'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.hotelclubdelaplage.com Hôtel Club de la Plage], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 60 participants from academics, HPC center/experts and industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6.png|600px|link=https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php/Ecfd:ecfd_6th_edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD6_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 19/07/2022: First announcement of the '''6th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD6_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS &amp;amp; P. Begou, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mesh adaptation - R. Letournel, Safran &amp;amp; V. Moureau, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - S. Mendez, IMAG &amp;amp; M. Bernard, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi-level domain decomposition method (DDM) for coupled systems of differential-algebraic equations (A. Quirós Rodrígues, V. Le Chenadec)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical approximation of multi-physics problems gives rise to complex linear systems, the solution of which leverages preconditioning techniques such as multi-grid or domain decomposition methods. This project aimed at coupling two Julia packages that being actively developed: a two-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for free-surface and two-phase flows (Flower.jl) on the other, and a Domain Decomposition package for Cartesian grids (DDM.jl). The decomposed matrix-vector product was optimised to reduce the overhead associated with halo exchanges. The implementation of a deflated Conjugate Gradient as well as one- and two-level Additive Schwartz Method were also completed and shown to significant reduce the number of iterations for inverting monolithic systems (i.e. without resorting to operator splitting), shown to be independent of the number of subdomains for constant property flows. Future work will focus on a further optimisation of the implementation for vectorisation and multi-threading, and extension of the deflation to generalised coarse spaces to support highly discontinuous transport properties (GenEO).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Ghost fluid method (GFM) for Electrodeformation (A. Spadotto , S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Optimization of the high order framework (HOF) for Navier-Stokes incompressible (M. Bernard, P. Bégou, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past years, a framework has been developed to improve the spatial accuracy of numerical schemes on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if the solution is more precise, the computational cost of the overall resolution of Navier-Stokes equations is large.&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, HOF becomes profitable only on thin meshes thanks to a better spatial convergence order.&lt;br /&gt;
The code has been analized with different analysis tools (MAQAO, Gprof, Scalasca).&lt;br /&gt;
The main time consuming routines have been identified and improved.&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, some algorithms have been refactors such that the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations has been speed-up by a factor 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Force coupling method (FCM) for particulate flows (C. Raveleau, S. Mendez)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Breaking limitations of the linearized implicit time advancement (T. Berthelon, G. Lartigue, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Development of a traction open boundary condition (TOBC) in Yales2 (J.B. Lagaert, Guillaume Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 7: Development of new spatial differential operators in Yales2 (M. Bernard, G. Lartigue)&lt;br /&gt;
It exists different philosophies for computing differential operators on distorted meshes.&lt;br /&gt;
In a HPC context, the 2 main approaches are the Green-Gauss operators and the Least-Squares operators.&lt;br /&gt;
During ECFD#6, 2 new types of &amp;quot;non-compact&amp;quot; Hessian operators have been implemented by computing successively the gradient operator, eather with Green-Gauss gradient, or with Least-Squares gradient.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators lead to good convergence order, even on distorted mehes.&lt;br /&gt;
However, their application on low-resolution signals lead to large error magnitude due to their extended stencil.\\&lt;br /&gt;
Another pair of gradient \&amp;amp; hessian Least-Squares operators have been implemented, leading to 2nd and 1st order accuracy for the gradient and hessian respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
Those operators have very interesting characteristics as their stencil is restricted to the direct neighbors only and their computational cost remains low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: DOROTHY optimization (M. Roperch, H. Mulakaloori, G. Pinon, P. Bénard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 9: Anamika, a tool to improve programming productivity (K. Mohana Muraly, G. Staffelbach)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulence - P. Benard, CORIA &amp;amp; G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Explore hybrid RANS/LES strategies (T. Berthelon, G. Balarac)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For complex industrial applications, LES can still lead to a too long restitution time. In other hand, statistical approaches can lead too a lack of accuracy. In this project, the potentiality of hybrid approaches combining both have been explored. Conventional hybrid RANS/LES approaches consider a unique solution field, with an unique transport equation and a clusre terme modeled using RANS or LES models depending of the regions. The main idea is to evaluate a strategy based on a separation between mean fields and fluctuations with distinct coupled transport equations. First elements of validation using YALES2 code are shown that it was possible to correct the prediction of a RANS models, by performing LES of the fluctuations. Next steps should be to consider disctinct meshes, or even computational domains for RANS and LES with this strategy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Flow Instabilities over Rotating curved Surfaces (S. Sawaf, M. Shadloo, A. Hadjadj, S. Moreau, S. Poncet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For evaluating the effect of the clearance between the blade tip and the casing of axial ducted fans on noise emissions, LES offers excellent tool to capture the consitricted flow around the blade tip especially for small clearances where RANS fails because of unsteady flow conditions. LES simulation of the aerodynamics is the first step toward extracting accoustics data that helps to improve the design of axial ducted fans so they comply with the noise emission regulations in admistrative buildings. noise emmisions are estimated using analytical aeroacoustic models informed by data that are extracted from the LES simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Automatic statistical convergence metric (C. Papagiannis, G. Balarac, O. Le Maitre, P. Congedo)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics accumulation can be an important part of the restitution time in unsteady simulations (DNS/LES). In this project, the goal was to estimate uncertainties on the &amp;quot;finite time statistics&amp;quot;. For time correlated data, it can be shown that the variance of the mean estimator (i.e. the fluctuation of the estimation of the mean) is dependent of the correlation time. Modeling this correlation time based on the integral time scale of the turbulence appears as a first way to define a practical metric to evaluate the statistic convergence on-fly during simulations. Next step should be to explore procedures to  accelerate the statistics accumulation step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wall law for Immersed Boundaries &amp;amp; Rough surfaces (M. Cailler, A. Cuffaro, P. Benez, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundaries (CLIB) are now a useful way to take into account complex geometries in YALES2. During the workshop, a brand-new data-structure for modular and generic immersed-body has been developed. This data-structure paves the way for various new capabilities for IB methods: penalization mask shape optimization for improved velocity imposition, better control of near wall discretization based on a reliable evaluation of wall units, wall-modeling, etc... For this purpose the periodic hill test case has been considered. Simulations of this configuration has been performed by using body-fitted meshes, and CLIB for both smooth and rough surfaces. This will allow to assess the accuracy of the IB methods, and will constitute a database for IB models improvement, and the development of wall-modeling strategies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 8: Atmospheric flow (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, P. Benard, S. Zeoli)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atmospheric flow such as Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) and thermal stratification have an impact on wind turbines aerodynamic and wakes. Mostly at a wind farm scale, the change of wind turbine wake size and recovery can modify the global power production. During the workshop, the Coriolis force implementation has been validated through neutral case (where no thermal stratification i.e. no temperature gradient). It also allowed to validate the pressure forcing term, needed to drive the flow in a periodic box. YALES2 results showed a good agreement with other numerical and experimental results. Afterwards, the stable case (i.e. temperature gradient downwards) has been studied. A surface temperature as boundary condition has been developed. Yet, results are not as expected and further investigation is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Two Phase Flow - C. Merlin, Ariane Group &amp;amp; M. Cailler, Safran Tech ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Convergent computation of interface curvature (G. Ghigliotti, M. Benard, G. Balarac, J. Carmona, R. Mercier, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Level-set distance evaluation through GPMM (Janodet et al., 2022) converges at order 2, the interface curvature convergence is as best 0 using the non-compact Goldman formulation. &lt;br /&gt;
Following progresses obtained during ECFD5, a strategy based on parabolic fit of the interface has been explored during the workshhop. This method aims at fitting a parabola through least squares  using the interface markers stored in the interface vicinity. First the method was applied on a 2-D perfectly spherical droplet with exact projection of the marker on the circle. This results in a first order convergent curvature. Without projection of the markers, the fiting strategy allows a slight decrease of the error but no improve on the curvature convergence order in comparison with the standard non-compact formulation. As a persective, these results will be validated on dynamic and 3-D cases (mmg3d meshes). Also, the sensitivity on the number of markers and their redundancy will be investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD6 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=435</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=435"/>
				<updated>2022-02-01T08:12:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started!!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 28/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event is now finished!''' It was again a successful scientific week. See you next year for the '''ECFD6'''! [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/l%C3%A9a-voivenel-642ab7186_avbp-yales2-yales2-activity-6892778892801716224-3zxn| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_PhotoGroupe.jpeg|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas and a Lagrangian description for the liquid phase. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal of a liquid droplet made of particles on an Eulerian grid. First, a level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is well captured on the mesh. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. This information was then used to build a velocity correction that is used to transport particles and ensures regularized particle positions. This preliminary benchmark work will be pursued on a liquid jet propagation problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Jet atomization with a diffuse interface mathod (N. Odier, B. Péden, J. Carmona, P. Boivin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A so-called diffuse interface method, using the multi-fluid formalism, coupled with a Riemann solver HLLC and a thermodynamic closure of type Noble-Abel Stiffened Gas (NASG), was implemented in AVBP during the thesis of Julien Carmona. During the ECFD5, the NASG thermodynamic was coupled with an improved HLLC solver implementation based on nodal information only, therefore leading to better performances in parallel. Moreover, the NSCBC terms expressed in the framework of the NASG thermodynamics were accurately derived. Future works include validation of the new solver capability on 1-D shock tube and isolated bubble test cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the divergence of the gradient of the distance to the interface. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators. This approach, implemented in a finite element code FreeFEM++, is based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to investigate the applicability of the conservative two-fluid transport framework developed for passive scalars to the momentum conservation equation. First a complete two-fluid framework for the incompressible two-phase Navier-Stokes equations was proposed. Then the algorithms for discontinuous scalars (data extension in the other phase, reinitialization and transport) have been extended to discontinuous vectors. Moreover, some improvement of the data-structure were implemented to further generalize the framework and improve user-experience. To eventually conclude on the applicability of the two-fluid momentum approach, the proposed interfacial momentum flux model and correction step will be implemented in YALES2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Avoiding the acoustic timestep restriction in two-phase flow simulations (V. Boniou, J. Paris, A. Vié, T. Schmitt, C. Tenaud, Y. Béchane)'''&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of simulating compressible two-phase flows with phase change, the CFL constraint related to the acoustic part of an explicit solver, especially in the liquid phase, can be prohibitive for evaporation studies implying large timescale separation between evaporation and acoustic wave propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
The acoustic CFL constraint can be either relaxed by considering an implicit treatment of the acoustic part or avoided by deriving the low Mach limit of the multifluid model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this week, the first steps of this vast work have been initiated on single-phase flows by implementing the variable-density low Mach solver and the IMEX method applied on the Euler equations in TITAN.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMEX method was shown to provide degraded solutions in acoustic-driven cases, compared to conventional Riemann solutions. However, in transport-dominated cases, the increase of the transport CFL leads to a better numerical precision. A 2D cylindrical shock has been simulated with an acoustic CFL of 40 to assess the ability to run multidimensional compressible computations with large time step. The method was also extented to 4eq and 2nd order spatial accuracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the extension of the variable density solver to two-phase flows was performed using a VOF interface capturing method, considering a dilatable gas phase along with an incompressible liquid phase. Particular attention has been drawn to preserving liquid volume by treating the VOF transport accordingly with an adapted velocity field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM) into the YALES2 library leads to poor performances when many wind turbine rotors are set. Indeed, each rotor object is a derived type treated sequentially by all the processors participating to the computation. With 30 turbines in a computation, the return time is increased by 70% while the arithmetic intensity appears to be low. The objective of this sub-project is to improve the computation performances of the ALM already identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(i) Assign one MPI communicator by rotor object gathering the processors close to the turbine and set-up a master/slave processus by communicator. This will allow the simultaneous rotors computation and reduce the number of MPI exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
(ii) Work on the domain decomposition to limit the number of processors attributed to each turbine. This would reduce or even eliminate MPI communications. &lt;br /&gt;
(iii) Adapt the YALES2-BHawC aero-servo-elastic coupling to make it consistent with the new ALM implementation. &lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, the (i)-algorithm has been implemented with additional optimizations. Tests on a 30-turbine wind farm showed a 60% improvement compared to previous performances, which is very promising. The (ii)-feature still needs to be developed but should lead to the performances objective. The tests with the coupled code YALES2-BHawC were not conclusive yet and still require some work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Dynamic stall correction models for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc, F. Houtin-Mongrolle)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The Actuator Line Method implementation into YALES2 library suffers from the lack of correction models for some 3D unsteady effects. An important one, the dynamic stall, implies an unsteady modification of the aerodynamic loads, i.e. the polars, with the angle of attack. With the standard ALM model, static 2D polars are used. Adding a dynamic stall correction model allow to have an hysteresis loop on the of the forces coefficient with the angle of attack. Several models exists in the literature: Oye, BeddoesLeishman, Sheng, Risoe, ONERA... During the workshop, the Oye model was selected, as it is the simplest model, and was implemented. First, new ingredients necessary to the model were added in the polars look-up table generator used to describe the blades. Then, the Oye correction was integrated into the YALES2 library. Finally, the model was tested on simple configurations. It is now essential to validate more the implementation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project4: Immersed Boundary solvers uniformisation into YALES2 (I. Tsetoglou, M. Cailler, P. Benez, S. Mendez, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
A novel Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundary (CLIB) method [Tsetoglou et al., 2021] has been developed by CORIA &amp;amp; Safran Tech for wind turbines &amp;amp; gearbox lubrication simulations. Nevertheless, two different implementations of the same method were created that tends to diverge. This sub-project aims to develop a shared numerical kernel (CLIB) on which 2 solvers are based: CIB for aerodynamic applications (ICS + CLIB) and TPS for two-phase flows (SPS+CLIB). The newly developed kernel and solvers were tested and validated on test cases: 2D flows around static/rotating/oscillating disk, 3D flow around a rotating cylinder and 2D flows around counter-rotating ellipses. The newt steps involve the continuation of the validation of both solvers and its documentation, as well as the development of wall model for immersed bodies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Within the STREAM project framework, a roughness-resolved Large-Eddy Simulation (RRLES) database is being built. The aim of this latter is to be representative of rough channel flows, especially for additive-manufacturing heat exchangers. First RRLES have already been performed. From turbulence and rough wall stress statistics analysis of the results, a first stochastic model, which reproduces the statistical behavior of the wall stress vector, have been proposed. The modeled wall stress allows a better prediction of the pressure drop in a flat wall channel compared to the use of the mean value of the wall stress measured in RRLES alone. However, the near wall region is still mispredicted and the model is correlated in time but not in space. The aim of this ECFD5 was to develop tools to improve modelling and explore new ways. A roughness mapping tool for smooth surfaces have been implemented into YALES2 to get local surface height. This tool is based on an existing in-house surface roughness generator developed for the STREAM project. The idea is to use the map to generated space correlated fluctuations for the wall shear stress. Some bugs still remain to fully use this tool. In parallel, the modelling approach was extended to passive scalar, especially for temperature. To this end, new random tools as white noise, unit sphere random walk and Gaussian / Log-normal stochastic processes have been coded. Finally, the idea of using walls as velocity source terms emerged during this ECFD5. The principle is to mask a grid layer above the wall and to transport the rough map on this grid to estimate the roughness effects above the wall. Parametrizing and testing these tools remained to be done at the end of ECFD5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi combustion model chemtable generator  (S. Dillon, R. Mercier)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the high computational cost of LES of turbulent combustion with detailed chemistry, tabulated chemistry approaches remain a popular choice within the combustion community. This popularity of tabulated chemistry leads to research into the development of novel combustion models for which a platform to test these models is required. The objective of the workshop was to therefore begin developing an easy-to-use chemistry table generator within Python. Given that there exists numerous turbulent combustion models (F-TACLES Diffusion, F-TACLES Premixed, 2PFT, etc.), a generalised multi-model code was necessary. Along with multi-model capabilities, the code was required to function with multiple solvers for the creation of the flame database (REGATH and CANTERA). With these objectives in mind, the code “TabulatEd Chemistry GenERator for Aeronautical CombusTion” (TECERACT) was created. Advancements were made in all key areas using code already developed by Safran Tech. TECERACT includes a parallel flame database generator and current developments are focused on multi-model functionality and simplified mesh management within Python. Once finished, the TECERACT code will provide a user-friendly chemistry table generator capable of producing chemistry tables for LES simulations and its multi-model structure will serve as a platform for future turbulent combustion model development/testing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Task-driven automatic run sequence (R. Mercier, J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objective of this project was to develop a new simulation workflow based on Task-driven approach. This approach could offer a higher flexibility to manage CFD simulations by decomposing the whole simulation on small sequences (run initialization, fuel injection, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This week showed the achievement of the first steps towards a complete task-driven simulation. (i) The whole simulation workflow was set-up (ii) Missing actions were implemented allowing to update simulation status on-the-fly (from non reactive to reactive simulation) (iii) State are now embedded from the restart solution allowing to restart from the last known state. Further work is still needed to obtain the full implementation of the AMC framework based on task-driven approach. Especially to automate the adaptation loop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: YALES2 Tools &amp;amp; Gitlab CI (J. Leparoux, A. Tstetoglou)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wind energy tools (E. Muller, S. Gremmo, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set-up phase of simulations involving several wind turbines is very demanding and error-prone, especially for simulations carried out with the coupled solver YALES2-BHawC*. This type of simulation can involve several dozen input files and then, an assistant tool is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives of this projet were (i) develop a python tools to set all necessary ACTUATOR_SET objects (ii) provide basic visualization plots allowing to monitor simulations on-the-fly (by post-processing YALES2 temporals and BHawC results files).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''*BHawC : aero-servo-elastic solver used and developped at Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy for wind turbine design and certification&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=434</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=434"/>
				<updated>2022-02-01T08:08:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started!!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 28/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event is now finished!''' It was again a successful scientific week. See you next year for the '''ECFD6'''! [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/l%C3%A9a-voivenel-642ab7186_avbp-yales2-yales2-activity-6892778892801716224-3zxn| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_PhotoGroupe.jpeg|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas and a Lagrangian description for the liquid phase. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal of a liquid droplet made of particles on an Eulerian grid. First, a level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is well captured on the mesh. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. This information was then used to build a velocity correction that is used to transport particles and ensures regularized particle positions. This preliminary benchmark work will be pursued on a liquid jet propagation problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Jet atomization with a diffuse interface mathod (N. Odier, B. Péden, J. Carmona, P. Boivin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A so-called diffuse interface method, using the multi-fluid formalism, coupled with a Riemann solver HLLC and a thermodynamic closure of type Noble-Abel Stiffened Gas (NASG), was implemented in AVBP during the thesis of Julien Carmona. During the ECFD5, the NASG thermodynamic was coupled with an improved HLLC solver implementation based on nodal information only, therefore leading to better performances in parallel. Moreover, the NSCBC terms expressed in the framework of the NASG thermodynamics were accurately derived. Future works include validation of the new solver capability on 1-D shock tube and isolated bubble test cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to investigate the applicability of the conservative two-fluid transport framework developed for passive scalars to the momentum conservation equation. First a complete two-fluid framework for the incompressible two-phase Navier-Stokes equations was proposed. Then the algorithms for discontinuous scalars (data extension in the other phase, reinitialization and transport) have been extended to discontinuous vectors. Moreover, some improvement of the data-structure were implemented to further generalize the framework and improve user-experience. To eventually conclude on the applicability of the two-fluid momentum approach, the proposed interfacial momentum flux model and correction step will be implemented in YALES2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Avoiding the acoustic timestep restriction in two-phase flow simulations (V. Boniou, J. Paris, A. Vié, T. Schmitt, C. Tenaud, Y. Béchane)'''&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of simulating compressible two-phase flows with phase change, the CFL constraint related to the acoustic part of an explicit solver, especially in the liquid phase, can be prohibitive for evaporation studies implying large timescale separation between evaporation and acoustic wave propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
The acoustic CFL constraint can be either relaxed by considering an implicit treatment of the acoustic part or avoided by deriving the low Mach limit of the multifluid model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this week, the first steps of this vast work have been initiated on single-phase flows by implementing the variable-density low Mach solver and the IMEX method applied on the Euler equations in TITAN.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMEX method was shown to provide degraded solutions in acoustic-driven cases, compared to conventional Riemann solutions. However, in transport-dominated cases, the increase of the transport CFL leads to a better numerical precision. A 2D cylindrical shock has been simulated with an acoustic CFL of 40 to assess the ability to run multidimensional compressible computations with large time step. The method was also extented to 4eq and 2nd order spatial accuracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the extension of the variable density solver to two-phase flows was performed using a VOF interface capturing method, considering a dilatable gas phase along with an incompressible liquid phase. Particular attention has been drawn to preserving liquid volume by treating the VOF transport accordingly with an adapted velocity field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM) into the YALES2 library leads to poor performances when many wind turbine rotors are set. Indeed, each rotor object is a derived type treated sequentially by all the processors participating to the computation. With 30 turbines in a computation, the return time is increased by 70% while the arithmetic intensity appears to be low. The objective of this sub-project is to improve the computation performances of the ALM already identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(i) Assign one MPI communicator by rotor object gathering the processors close to the turbine and set-up a master/slave processus by communicator. This will allow the simultaneous rotors computation and reduce the number of MPI exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
(ii) Work on the domain decomposition to limit the number of processors attributed to each turbine. This would reduce or even eliminate MPI communications. &lt;br /&gt;
(iii) Adapt the YALES2-BHawC aero-servo-elastic coupling to make it consistent with the new ALM implementation. &lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, the (i)-algorithm has been implemented with additional optimizations. Tests on a 30-turbine wind farm showed a 60% improvement compared to previous performances, which is very promising. The (ii)-feature still needs to be developed but should lead to the performances objective. The tests with the coupled code YALES2-BHawC were not conclusive yet and still require some work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Dynamic stall correction models for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc, F. Houtin-Mongrolle)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The Actuator Line Method implementation into YALES2 library suffers from the lack of correction models for some 3D unsteady effects. An important one, the dynamic stall, implies an unsteady modification of the aerodynamic loads, i.e. the polars, with the angle of attack. With the standard ALM model, static 2D polars are used. Adding a dynamic stall correction model allow to have an hysteresis loop on the of the forces coefficient with the angle of attack. Several models exists in the literature: Oye, BeddoesLeishman, Sheng, Risoe, ONERA... During the workshop, the Oye model was selected, as it is the simplest model, and was implemented. First, new ingredients necessary to the model were added in the polars look-up table generator used to describe the blades. Then, the Oye correction was integrated into the YALES2 library. Finally, the model was tested on simple configurations. It is now essential to validate more the implementation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project4: Immersed Boundary solvers uniformisation into YALES2 (I. Tsetoglou, M. Cailler, P. Benez, S. Mendez, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
A novel Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundary (CLIB) method [Tsetoglou et al., 2021] has been developed by CORIA &amp;amp; Safran Tech for wind turbines &amp;amp; gearbox lubrication simulations. Nevertheless, two different implementations of the same method were created that tends to diverge. This sub-project aims to develop a shared numerical kernel (CLIB) on which 2 solvers are based: CIB for aerodynamic applications (ICS + CLIB) and TPS for two-phase flows (SPS+CLIB). The newly developed kernel and solvers were tested and validated on test cases: 2D flows around static/rotating/oscillating disk, 3D flow around a rotating cylinder and 2D flows around counter-rotating ellipses. The newt steps involve the continuation of the validation of both solvers and its documentation, as well as the development of wall model for immersed bodies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Within the STREAM project framework, a roughness-resolved Large-Eddy Simulation (RRLES) database is being built. The aim of this latter is to be representative of rough channel flows, especially for additive-manufacturing heat exchangers. First RRLES have already been performed. From turbulence and rough wall stress statistics analysis of the results, a first stochastic model, which reproduces the statistical behavior of the wall stress vector, have been proposed. The modeled wall stress allows a better prediction of the pressure drop in a flat wall channel compared to the use of the mean value of the wall stress measured in RRLES alone. However, the near wall region is still mispredicted and the model is correlated in time but not in space. The aim of this ECFD5 was to develop tools to improve modelling and explore new ways. A roughness mapping tool for smooth surfaces have been implemented into YALES2 to get local surface height. This tool is based on an existing in-house surface roughness generator developed for the STREAM project. The idea is to use the map to generated space correlated fluctuations for the wall shear stress. Some bugs still remain to fully use this tool. In parallel, the modelling approach was extended to passive scalar, especially for temperature. To this end, new random tools as white noise, unit sphere random walk and Gaussian / Log-normal stochastic processes have been coded. Finally, the idea of using walls as velocity source terms emerged during this ECFD5. The principle is to mask a grid layer above the wall and to transport the rough map on this grid to estimate the roughness effects above the wall. Parametrizing and testing these tools remained to be done at the end of ECFD5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi combustion model chemtable generator  (S. Dillon, R. Mercier)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the high computational cost of LES of turbulent combustion with detailed chemistry, tabulated chemistry approaches remain a popular choice within the combustion community. This popularity of tabulated chemistry leads to research into the development of novel combustion models for which a platform to test these models is required. The objective of the workshop was to therefore begin developing an easy-to-use chemistry table generator within Python. Given that there exists numerous turbulent combustion models (F-TACLES Diffusion, F-TACLES Premixed, 2PFT, etc.), a generalised multi-model code was necessary. Along with multi-model capabilities, the code was required to function with multiple solvers for the creation of the flame database (REGATH and CANTERA). With these objectives in mind, the code “TabulatEd Chemistry GenERator for Aeronautical CombusTion” (TECERACT) was created. Advancements were made in all key areas using code already developed by Safran Tech. TECERACT includes a parallel flame database generator and current developments are focused on multi-model functionality and simplified mesh management within Python. Once finished, the TECERACT code will provide a user-friendly chemistry table generator capable of producing chemistry tables for LES simulations and its multi-model structure will serve as a platform for future turbulent combustion model development/testing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Task-driven automatic run sequence (R. Mercier, J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objective of this project was to develop a new simulation workflow based on Task-driven approach. This approach could offer a higher flexibility to manage CFD simulations by decomposing the whole simulation on small sequences (run initialization, fuel injection, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This week showed the achievement of the first steps towards a complete task-driven simulation. (i) The whole simulation workflow was set-up (ii) Missing actions were implemented allowing to update simulation status on-the-fly (from non reactive to reactive simulation) (iii) State are now embedded from the restart solution allowing to restart from the last known state. Further work is still needed to obtain the full implementation of the AMC framework based on task-driven approach. Especially to automate the adaptation loop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: YALES2 Tools &amp;amp; Gitlab CI (J. Leparoux, A. Tstetoglou)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wind energy tools (E. Muller, S. Gremmo, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set-up phase of simulations involving several wind turbines is very demanding and error-prone, especially for simulations carried out with the coupled solver YALES2-BHawC*. This type of simulation can involve several dozen input files and then, an assistant tool is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives of this projet were (i) develop a python tools to set all necessary ACTUATOR_SET objects (ii) provide basic visualization plots allowing to monitor simulations on-the-fly (by post-processing YALES2 temporals and BHawC results files).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''*BHawC : aero-servo-elastic solver used and developped at Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy for wind turbine design and certification&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=433</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=433"/>
				<updated>2022-02-01T08:06:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started!!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 28/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event is now finished!''' It was again a successful scientific week. See you next year for the '''ECFD6'''! [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/l%C3%A9a-voivenel-642ab7186_avbp-yales2-yales2-activity-6892778892801716224-3zxn| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_PhotoGroupe.jpeg|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid phase. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal of a liquid droplet made of particles on an Eulerian grid. First, a level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is well captured on the mesh. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. This information was then used to build a velocity correction that is used to transport particles and ensures regularized particle positions. This preliminary benchmark work will be pursued on a liquid jet propagation problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Jet atomization with a diffuse interface mathod (N. Odier, B. Péden, J. Carmona, P. Boivin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A so-called diffuse interface method, using the multi-fluid formalism, coupled with a Riemann solver HLLC and a thermodynamic closure of the Noble-Abel Stiffened Gas type (NASG), was implemented in AVBP during the thesis of Julien Carmona. During the ECFD5, the NASG thermodynamic was coupled with an improved HLLC solver implementation based on nodal information only, therefore leading to better performances in parallel. Moreover, the NSCBC terms expressed in the framework of the NASG thermodynamics were accurately derived. Future works include validation of the new solver capability on 1-D shock tube and isolated bubble test cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to investigate the applicability of the conservative two-fluid transport framework developed for passive scalars to the momentum conservation equation. First a complete two-fluid framework for the incompressible two-phase Navier-Stokes equations was proposed. Then the discontinuous algorithms for discontinuous scalars (data extension, reinitialization and transport) have been extended to discontinuous vectors. Moreover, some improvement of the data-structure were implemented to further generalize the framework and improve user-experience. To eventually conclude on the applicability of the proposed two-fluid momentum approach, the proposed interfacial momentum flux model and correction step will be implemented in YALES2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Avoiding the acoustic timestep restriction in two-phase flow simulations (V. Boniou, J. Paris, A. Vié, T. Schmitt, C. Tenaud, Y. Béchane)'''&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of simulating compressible two-phase flows with phase change, the CFL constraint related to the acoustic part of an explicit solver, especially in the liquid phase, can be prohibitive for evaporation studies implying large timescale separation between evaporation and acoustic wave propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
The acoustic CFL constraint can be either relaxed by considering an implicit treatment of the acoustic part or avoided by deriving the low Mach limit of the multifluid model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this week, the first steps of this vast work have been initiated on single-phase flows by implementing the variable-density low Mach solver and the IMEX method applied on the Euler equations in TITAN.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMEX method was shown to provide degraded solutions in acoustic-driven cases, compared to conventional Riemann solutions. However, in transport-dominated cases, the increase of the transport CFL leads to a better numerical precision. A 2D cylindrical shock has been simulated with an acoustic CFL of 40 to assess the ability to run multidimensional compressible computations with large time step. The method was also extented to 4eq and 2nd order spatial accuracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the extension of the variable density solver to two-phase flows was performed using a VOF interface capturing method, considering a dilatable gas phase along with an incompressible liquid phase. Particular attention has been drawn to preserving liquid volume by treating the VOF transport accordingly with an adapted velocity field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of the Actuator Line Method (ALM) into the YALES2 library leads to poor performances when many wind turbine rotors are set. Indeed, each rotor object is a derived type treated sequentially by all the processors participating to the computation. With 30 turbines in a computation, the return time is increased by 70% while the arithmetic intensity appears to be low. The objective of this sub-project is to improve the computation performances of the ALM already identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(i) Assign one MPI communicator by rotor object gathering the processors close to the turbine and set-up a master/slave processus by communicator. This will allow the simultaneous rotors computation and reduce the number of MPI exchanges.&lt;br /&gt;
(ii) Work on the domain decomposition to limit the number of processors attributed to each turbine. This would reduce or even eliminate MPI communications. &lt;br /&gt;
(iii) Adapt the YALES2-BHawC aero-servo-elastic coupling to make it consistent with the new ALM implementation. &lt;br /&gt;
During the workshop, the (i)-algorithm has been implemented with additional optimizations. Tests on a 30-turbine wind farm showed a 60% improvement compared to previous performances, which is very promising. The (ii)-feature still needs to be developed but should lead to the performances objective. The tests with the coupled code YALES2-BHawC were not conclusive yet and still require some work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Dynamic stall correction models for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (S. Gremmo, E. Muller, B. Duboc, F. Houtin-Mongrolle)'''&lt;br /&gt;
The Actuator Line Method implementation into YALES2 library suffers from the lack of correction models for some 3D unsteady effects. An important one, the dynamic stall, implies an unsteady modification of the aerodynamic loads, i.e. the polars, with the angle of attack. With the standard ALM model, static 2D polars are used. Adding a dynamic stall correction model allow to have an hysteresis loop on the of the forces coefficient with the angle of attack. Several models exists in the literature: Oye, BeddoesLeishman, Sheng, Risoe, ONERA... During the workshop, the Oye model was selected, as it is the simplest model, and was implemented. First, new ingredients necessary to the model were added in the polars look-up table generator used to describe the blades. Then, the Oye correction was integrated into the YALES2 library. Finally, the model was tested on simple configurations. It is now essential to validate more the implementation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project4: Immersed Boundary solvers uniformisation into YALES2 (I. Tsetoglou, M. Cailler, P. Benez, S. Mendez, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
A novel Conservative Lagrangian Immersed Boundary (CLIB) method [Tsetoglou et al., 2021] has been developed by CORIA &amp;amp; Safran Tech for wind turbines &amp;amp; gearbox lubrication simulations. Nevertheless, two different implementations of the same method were created that tends to diverge. This sub-project aims to develop a shared numerical kernel (CLIB) on which 2 solvers are based: CIB for aerodynamic applications (ICS + CLIB) and TPS for two-phase flows (SPS+CLIB). The newly developed kernel and solvers were tested and validated on test cases: 2D flows around static/rotating/oscillating disk, 3D flow around a rotating cylinder and 2D flows around counter-rotating ellipses. The newt steps involve the continuation of the validation of both solvers and its documentation, as well as the development of wall model for immersed bodies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Within the STREAM project framework, a roughness-resolved Large-Eddy Simulation (RRLES) database is being built. The aim of this latter is to be representative of rough channel flows, especially for additive-manufacturing heat exchangers. First RRLES have already been performed. From turbulence and rough wall stress statistics analysis of the results, a first stochastic model, which reproduces the statistical behavior of the wall stress vector, have been proposed. The modeled wall stress allows a better prediction of the pressure drop in a flat wall channel compared to the use of the mean value of the wall stress measured in RRLES alone. However, the near wall region is still mispredicted and the model is correlated in time but not in space. The aim of this ECFD5 was to develop tools to improve modelling and explore new ways. A roughness mapping tool for smooth surfaces have been implemented into YALES2 to get local surface height. This tool is based on an existing in-house surface roughness generator developed for the STREAM project. The idea is to use the map to generated space correlated fluctuations for the wall shear stress. Some bugs still remain to fully use this tool. In parallel, the modelling approach was extended to passive scalar, especially for temperature. To this end, new random tools as white noise, unit sphere random walk and Gaussian / Log-normal stochastic processes have been coded. Finally, the idea of using walls as velocity source terms emerged during this ECFD5. The principle is to mask a grid layer above the wall and to transport the rough map on this grid to estimate the roughness effects above the wall. Parametrizing and testing these tools remained to be done at the end of ECFD5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi combustion model chemtable generator  (S. Dillon, R. Mercier)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the high computational cost of LES of turbulent combustion with detailed chemistry, tabulated chemistry approaches remain a popular choice within the combustion community. This popularity of tabulated chemistry leads to research into the development of novel combustion models for which a platform to test these models is required. The objective of the workshop was to therefore begin developing an easy-to-use chemistry table generator within Python. Given that there exists numerous turbulent combustion models (F-TACLES Diffusion, F-TACLES Premixed, 2PFT, etc.), a generalised multi-model code was necessary. Along with multi-model capabilities, the code was required to function with multiple solvers for the creation of the flame database (REGATH and CANTERA). With these objectives in mind, the code “TabulatEd Chemistry GenERator for Aeronautical CombusTion” (TECERACT) was created. Advancements were made in all key areas using code already developed by Safran Tech. TECERACT includes a parallel flame database generator and current developments are focused on multi-model functionality and simplified mesh management within Python. Once finished, the TECERACT code will provide a user-friendly chemistry table generator capable of producing chemistry tables for LES simulations and its multi-model structure will serve as a platform for future turbulent combustion model development/testing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Task-driven automatic run sequence (R. Mercier, J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objective of this project was to develop a new simulation workflow based on Task-driven approach. This approach could offer a higher flexibility to manage CFD simulations by decomposing the whole simulation on small sequences (run initialization, fuel injection, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This week showed the achievement of the first steps towards a complete task-driven simulation. (i) The whole simulation workflow was set-up (ii) Missing actions were implemented allowing to update simulation status on-the-fly (from non reactive to reactive simulation) (iii) State are now embedded from the restart solution allowing to restart from the last known state. Further work is still needed to obtain the full implementation of the AMC framework based on task-driven approach. Especially to automate the adaptation loop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: YALES2 Tools &amp;amp; Gitlab CI (J. Leparoux, A. Tstetoglou)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wind energy tools (E. Muller, S. Gremmo, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set-up phase of simulations involving several wind turbines is very demanding and error-prone, especially for simulations carried out with the coupled solver YALES2-BHawC*. This type of simulation can involve several dozen input files and then, an assistant tool is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives of this projet were (i) develop a python tools to set all necessary ACTUATOR_SET objects (ii) provide basic visualization plots allowing to monitor simulations on-the-fly (by post-processing YALES2 temporals and BHawC results files).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''*BHawC : aero-servo-elastic solver used and developped at Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy for wind turbine design and certification&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=422</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=422"/>
				<updated>2022-02-01T04:13:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid phase. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal of a liquid droplet made of particles on an Eulerian grid. First, a level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is well captured on the mesh. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. This information was then used to build a velocity correction that is used to transport particles and ensures regularized particle positions. This preliminary banchmark work will be pursued on a liquid jet propagation problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Jet atomization with a diffuse interface mathod (N. Odier, B. Péden, J. Carmona, P. Boivin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A so-called diffuse interface method, using the multi-fluid formalism, coupled with a Riemann solver HLLC and a thermodynamic closure of the NASG type, was implemented in AVBP during the thesis of Carmona. Objective of the project was to couple the NASG thermodynamic implementation in an improved HLLC solver based on nodal information only. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to investigate the applicability of the conservative two-fluid transport framework developed for passive scalars to the momentum conservation equation. First a complete two-fluid framework for the incompressible two-phase Navier-Stokes equations was proposed. Then the discontinuous algorithms for discontinuous scalars (data extension, reinitialization and transport) have been extended to discontinuous vectors. Moreover, some improvement of the data-structure were implemented to further generalize the framework and improve user-experience. To eventually conclude on the applicability of the proposed two-fluid momentum approach, the proposed interfacial momentum flux model and correction step will be implemented in YALES2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Avoiding the acoustic timestep restriction in two-phase flow simulations (V. Boniou, J. Paris, A. Vié, T. Schmitt, C. Tenaud, Y. Béchane)'''&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of simulating compressible two-phase flows with phase change, the CFL constraint related to the acoustic part of an explicit solver, especially in the liquid phase, can be prohibitive for evaporation studies implying large timescale separation between evaporation and acoustic wave propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
The acoustic CFL constraint can be either relaxed by considering an implicit treatment of the acoustic part or avoided by deriving the low Mach limit of the multifluid model.&lt;br /&gt;
During this week, the first steps of this vast work have been initiated on single-phase flows by implementing the variable-density low Mach solver and the IMEX method applied on the Euler equations in TITAN.&lt;br /&gt;
The IMEX method was tested on acoustic-related and pure-transport 1D test cases and compared to classic explicit schemes. Then, a cylindrical shock has been performed with an acoustic CFL of 40 to assess the acoustic implicitation.&lt;br /&gt;
Finaly, the extension of the variable density solver to two-phase flows was performed using a VOF interface tracking method. In this new step, the gas is dilatable while the liquid is incompressible. Particular attention has been drawn to preserving liquid volume by treating the VOF transport accordingly with an adapted velocity field.&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, a first implementation of IMEX applied to a 4eq multifluid model have been performed along with an extension to second order spatial accuracy of the acoustic part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Within the STREAM project framework, a roughness-resolved Large-Eddy Simulation (RRLES) database is being built. The aim of this latter is to be representative of rough channel flows, especially for additive-manufacturing heat exchangers. First RRLES have already been performed. From turbulence and rough wall stress statistics analysis of the results, a first stochastic model, which reproduces the statistical behavior of the wall stress vector, have been proposed. The modeled wall stress allows a better prediction of the pressure drop in a flat wall channel compared to the use of the mean value of the wall stress measured in RRLES alone. However, the near wall region is still mispredicted and the model is correlated in time but not in space. The aim of this ECFD5 was to develop tools to improve modelling and explore new ways. A roughness mapping tool for smooth surfaces have been implemented into YALES2 to get local surface height. This tool is based on an existing in-house surface roughness generator developed for the STREAM project. The idea is to use the map to generated space correlated fluctuations for the wall shear stress. Some bugs still remain to fully use this tool. In parallel, the modelling approach was extended to passive scalar, especially for temperature. To this end, new random tools as white noise, unit sphere random walk and Gaussian / Log-normal stochastic processes have been coded. Finally, the idea of using walls as velocity source terms emerged during this ECFD5. The principle is to mask a grid layer above the wall and to transport the rough map on this grid to estimate the roughness effects above the wall. Parametrizing and testing these tools remained to be done at the end of ECFD5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi combustion model chemtable generator  (S. Dillon, R. Mercier)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the high computational cost of LES of turbulent combustion with detailed chemistry, tabulated chemistry approaches remain a popular choice within the combustion community. This popularity of tabulated chemistry leads to research into the development of novel combustion models for which a platform to test these models is required. The objective of the workshop was to therefore begin developing an easy-to-use chemistry table generator within Python. Given that there exists numerous turbulent combustion models (F-TACLES Diffusion, F-TACLES Premixed, 2PFT, etc.), a generalised multi-model code was necessary. Along with multi-model capabilities, the code was required to function with multiple solvers for the creation of the flame database (REGATH and CANTERA). With these objectives in mind, the code “TabulatEd Chemistry GenERator for Aeronautical CombusTion” (TECERACT) was created. Advancements were made in all key areas using code already developed by Safran Tech. TECERACT includes a parallel flame database generator and current developments are focused on multi-model functionality and simplified mesh management within Python. Once finished, the TECERACT code will provide a user-friendly chemistry table generator capable of producing chemistry tables for LES simulations and its multi-model structure will serve as a platform for future turbulent combustion model development/testing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Task-driven automatic run sequence (R. Mercier, J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objective of this project was to develop a new simulation workflow based on Task-driven approach. This approach could offer a higher flexibility to manage CFD simulations by decomposing the whole simulation on small sequences (run initialization, fuel injection, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This week showed the achievement of the first steps towards a complete task-driven simulation. (i) The whole simulation workflow was set-up (ii) Missing actions were implemented allowing to update simulation status on-the-fly (from non reactive to reactive simulation) (iii) State are now embedded from the restart solution allowing to restart from the last known state. Further work is still needed to obtain the full implementation of the AMC framework based on task-driven approach. Especially to automate the adaptation loop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: YALES2 Tools &amp;amp; Gitlab CI (J. Leparoux, A. Tstetoglou)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wind energy tools (E. Muller, S. Gremmo, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set-up phase of simulations involving several wind turbines is very demanding and error-prone, especially for simulations carried out with the coupled solver YALES2-BHawC*. This type of simulation can involve several dozen input files and then, an assistant tool is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives of this projet were (i) develop a python tools to set all necessary ACTUATOR_SET objects (ii) provide basic visualization plots allowing to monitor simulations on-the-fly (by post-processing YALES2 temporals and BHawC results files).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''*BHawC : aero-servo-elastic solver used and developped at Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy for wind turbine design and certification&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=421</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=421"/>
				<updated>2022-02-01T04:07:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: H2/air jet-in-cross-flow numerical simulations (R. Le Dortz, E. Riber, Q. Douasbin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of hydrogen as an aviation fuel requires new combustion chamber design. Among strategies to prevent flame flashback and low flame residence time, the micromix injection system is further studied by ENABLEH2. This systems corresponds to a multitude of H2/air jet-in-cross-flow configurations. A 3D numerical simulation with realistic thermodynamics and kinetics is now tractable thanks to massively parralel computing. This week saw the completion of the first steps towards the establishment of a complete simulation. (I) The non-reactive air injection in the combustion chamber. (II) The cross-injection of H2 without ignition. (III) The ignition of this mixture modeled with the skeletal kinetic mechanism of Boivin (H2, H, O2, OH, O, H2O, HO2, H2O2, N2). Further work will be realised concerning mesh refinement, modelling of NOx and porting of the computation on GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: LES calculation of the MICADO test rig with multicomponent jetA1 (S. Puggelli, T. Lesaffre, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU-funded project ALTERNATE has the goal of exploring the possibility for a wider utilisation of aviation sustainable fuels. A part of the project deals with the assessment of the effect of SAFs on soot production: using the experimental information obtained at ONERA in high-pressure conditions on the MICADO test rig, the effect of Alcohol to Jet (ATJ-SPK) fuel on soot levels are assessed and compared with standard jet A1 emissions. During the project, STech and CERFACS are working jointly on the numerical modelling of soot emissions for jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK combustion in AVBP. Starting from the numerical setup under-development for jet-A1, the worshop permitted to: (I) Switch from a 2-step kinetic mechanism to a complex 29 species, 233 reacs and 15 QSS mechanism. This transition was efficiently conducted with the tool Multi Table Generator. (II) At this stage, an assessment of the effects of the flame sensor on the calculation results was carried out, indicating the consistent behaviour of a recently developped sensor w.r.t classical tools. (III) Switch towards a multicomponent formulation of jet-A1 and assessment of the effect of such advanced approach with respect to the single-component formulation previously employed. Further work will be realised to manage the stiffness of employed kinetics and to compare jet-A1 and ATJ-SPK fuels from a chemical point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Euler-Lagrange Multigrid Simulation (T. Lesaffre, O. Vermorel, E. Riber, B. Cuenot)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrange simulations, the point-source approach is based on a ponctual approximation of the particule and requires this last to be smaller than the mesh. The very fine meshes required to represent the Eulerian phase of Euler-Lagrange two-phase flow simulations can lead to a non-validity of the point-source hypothesis. This project aimed at implementing, in the AVBP solver, the simultaneous management and coupling of several simulations. During this week, the Eulerian and Lagrangian phase were successfuly computed on two different meshes and coupled via the CWIPI library. The good behaviour of this framework was assessed on a 1D Evaporation of kerosene droplets in an air stream test case. Encouraging preliminary performance results were obtained on a 3D injection case and require further work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Devolatilization modelling for biomass combustion (K. Bioche, L. Bricteux)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biomass combustion simulations require the modelling of numerous physical phenomena: particle drying, devolatilization, gas-phase combustion, chars oxidation. Besides, the valorisation chains for biomass include fluidized bed reactors, fixed bed reactors and pulverized fuel burners. The Granular Flow Solver of YALES2 offers a good framework for the simulation of fluidized bed reactors and is functionnaly coupled with the reactive gas-phase solver of the same code. This week permitted to partically implement the modelling of devolatilization in this solver. A single-step kinetic scheme is considered for the particle mass evolution equation while the particle diameter evolves during the process. Further work is necessary to account for the thermal and mass couplings with the fluid phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: Thickened-Flame LES model in a Lattice-Boltzmann Method framework (P. Boivin, S. Zhao, M. Le Boursicaud)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TFLES framework of the hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann sover ProLB was extended to account for recent sensor methods. During this week, a smooth flame sensor based on the curvature of the norm of the advancement variable gradient was developped. Also for filtering operations, the lattice requires to access data over three neighboring layers. A precise and continuous thickening factor was obtained with such method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: NOx modeling applied to KIAI combustion chamber (J. Obando, P. Bénard, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project treated of the implementation of NOx modeling into simulations of the KIAI combustion chamber, experimentaly studied at CORIA lab. During this week, various NOx modeling strategies were listed. Associated kinetic mechanisms, among which analytical chemisty, were employed for 1D flame simulations in YALES2 solver. Further work include the use of such methods on the 3D computational case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid phase. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal of a liquid droplet made of particles on an Eulerian grid. First, a level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is well captured on the mesh. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. This information was then used to build a velocity correction that is used to transport particles and ensures regularized particle positions. This preliminary banchmark work will be pursued on a liquid jet propagation problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Jet atomization with a diffuse interface mathod (N. Odier, B. Péden, J. Carmona, P. Boivin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to investigate the applicability of the conservative two-fluid transport framework developed for passive scalars to the momentum conservation equation. First a complete two-fluid framework for the incompressible two-phase Navier-Stokes equations was proposed. Then the discontinuous algorithms for discontinuous scalars (data extension, reinitialization and transport) have been extended to discontinuous vectors. Moreover, some improvement of the data-structure were implemented to further generalize the framework and improve user-experience. To eventually conclude on the applicability of the proposed two-fluid momentum approach, the proposed interfacial momentum flux model and correction step will be implemented in YALES2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Avoiding the acoustic timestep restriction in two-phase flow simulations (V. Boniou, J. Paris, A. Vié, T. Schmitt, C. Tenaud, Y. Béchane)'''&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of simulating compressible two-phase flows with phase change, the CFL constraint related to the acoustic part of an explicit solver, especially in the liquid phase, can be prohibitive for evaporation studies implying large timescale separation between evaporation and acoustic wave propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
The acoustic CFL constraint can be either relaxed by considering an implicit treatment of the acoustic part or avoided by deriving the low Mach limit of the multifluid model.&lt;br /&gt;
During this week, the first steps of this vast work have been initiated on single-phase flows by implementing the variable-density low Mach solver and the IMEX method applied on the Euler equations in TITAN.&lt;br /&gt;
The IMEX method was tested on acoustic-related and pure-transport 1D test cases and compared to classic explicit schemes. Then, a cylindrical shock has been performed with an acoustic CFL of 40 to assess the acoustic implicitation.&lt;br /&gt;
Finaly, the extension of the variable density solver to two-phase flows was performed using a VOF interface tracking method. In this new step, the gas is dilatable while the liquid is incompressible. Particular attention has been drawn to preserving liquid volume by treating the VOF transport accordingly with an adapted velocity field.&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, a first implementation of IMEX applied to a 4eq multifluid model have been performed along with an extension to second order spatial accuracy of the acoustic part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Thermal effect in an atmospheric solver (U. Vigny, L. Voivenel, S. Zeoli, P. Benard)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Given the current environmental and energy challenges, maximising the wind farm electricity production is essential. Therefore, it becomes necessary to develop the most reliable and accurate prediction and simulation tools. Following this tenet, an atmospheric solver, which will take into account meteorological phenomena, should be developed. The preliminary work, going from bibliography study to road map was performed during the extreme cod workshop. Thus five parts have been identified:&lt;br /&gt;
(I) The YALES2 Variable Density Solver (VDS) will be used because of the need to take into account buoyancy effect including for big density differences.&lt;br /&gt;
(II) A wall law correction term, relative to atmospheric boundary layer will be added. &lt;br /&gt;
(III) The actuator line method used to simulate wind turbine will be extended to VDS, modifying the velocity source term to a momentum source term.&lt;br /&gt;
(IV) The Coriolis effects, depending on the latitude will be implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
(V) The wall heat flux, allowing to simulate diurnal and nocturnal cycles on various terrains, is more realistic than a target wall temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
From this work, future development are now clear and just waiting to be developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Within the STREAM project framework, a roughness-resolved Large-Eddy Simulation (RRLES) database is being built. The aim of this latter is to be representative of rough channel flows, especially for additive-manufacturing heat exchangers. First RRLES have already been performed. From turbulence and rough wall stress statistics analysis of the results, a first stochastic model, which reproduces the statistical behavior of the wall stress vector, have been proposed. The modeled wall stress allows a better prediction of the pressure drop in a flat wall channel compared to the use of the mean value of the wall stress measured in RRLES alone. However, the near wall region is still mispredicted and the model is correlated in time but not in space. The aim of this ECFD5 was to develop tools to improve modelling and explore new ways. A roughness mapping tool for smooth surfaces have been implemented into YALES2 to get local surface height. This tool is based on an existing in-house surface roughness generator developed for the STREAM project. The idea is to use the map to generated space correlated fluctuations for the wall shear stress. Some bugs still remain to fully use this tool. In parallel, the modelling approach was extended to passive scalar, especially for temperature. To this end, new random tools as white noise, unit sphere random walk and Gaussian / Log-normal stochastic processes have been coded. Finally, the idea of using walls as velocity source terms emerged during this ECFD5. The principle is to mask a grid layer above the wall and to transport the rough map on this grid to estimate the roughness effects above the wall. Parametrizing and testing these tools remained to be done at the end of ECFD5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Multi combustion model chemtable generator  (S. Dillon, R. Mercier)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the high computational cost of LES of turbulent combustion with detailed chemistry, tabulated chemistry approaches remain a popular choice within the combustion community. This popularity of tabulated chemistry leads to research into the development of novel combustion models for which a platform to test these models is required. The objective of the workshop was to therefore begin developing an easy-to-use chemistry table generator within Python. Given that there exists numerous turbulent combustion models (F-TACLES Diffusion, F-TACLES Premixed, 2PFT, etc.), a generalised multi-model code was necessary. Along with multi-model capabilities, the code was required to function with multiple solvers for the creation of the flame database (REGATH and CANTERA). With these objectives in mind, the code “TabulatEd Chemistry GenERator for Aeronautical CombusTion” (TECERACT) was created. Advancements were made in all key areas using code already developed by Safran Tech. TECERACT includes a parallel flame database generator and current developments are focused on multi-model functionality and simplified mesh management within Python. Once finished, the TECERACT code will provide a user-friendly chemistry table generator capable of producing chemistry tables for LES simulations and its multi-model structure will serve as a platform for future turbulent combustion model development/testing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 2: Task-driven automatic run sequence (R. Mercier, J. Leparoux, M. Cailler, R. Letournel)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objective of this project was to develop a new simulation workflow based on Task-driven approach. This approach could offer a higher flexibility to manage CFD simulations by decomposing the whole simulation on small sequences (run initialization, fuel injection, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This week showed the achievement of the first steps towards a complete task-driven simulation. (i) The whole simulation workflow was set-up (ii) Missing actions were implemented allowing to update simulation status on-the-fly (from non reactive to reactive simulation) (iii) State are now embedded from the restart solution allowing to restart from the last known state. Further work is still needed to obtain the full implementation of the AMC framework based on task-driven approach. Especially to automate the adaptation loop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: YALES2 Tools &amp;amp; Gitlab CI (J. Leparoux, A. Tstetoglou)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Wind energy tools (E. Muller, S. Gremmo, F. Houtin-Mongrolle, B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set-up phase of simulations involving several wind turbines is very demanding and error-prone, especially for simulations carried out with the coupled solver YALES2-BHawC*. This type of simulation can involve several dozen input files and then, an assistant tool is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives of this projet were (i) develop a python tools to set all necessary ACTUATOR_SET objects (ii) provide basic visualization plots allowing to monitor simulations on-the-fly (by post-processing YALES2 temporals and BHawC results files).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''*BHawC : aero-servo-elastic solver used and developped at Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy for wind turbine design and certification&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Participants: I. d'Ast, J. Legaux, G. Staffelbach, P. Begou, G. Lartigue, V. Moureau, A. Toure, C. Laurie, S. Delamare, C. Andrieu, C. Jourdain'''&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=396</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=396"/>
				<updated>2022-01-30T02:40:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=395</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 5th edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_5th_edition&amp;diff=395"/>
				<updated>2022-01-30T02:39:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 5th edition, 2022}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:Logo_ECFD5.png | center | thumb | 350px | ECFD5 workshop logo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* Event from '''23th to 28th of January 2022'''&lt;br /&gt;
* Location: [https://www.bonsejour-laplage.com/vacances-tout-compris Centre Bonséjour], Merville-Franceville, near Caen (14)&lt;br /&gt;
* Two types of sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
** common technical presentations: roadmaps, specific points.&lt;br /&gt;
** mini-workshops. Potential workshops are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
* Free of charge&lt;br /&gt;
* More than 50 participants from academics (CERFACS, CORIA, IMAG, LEGI, EM2C, UMONS, UVM, VUB, UCL, TUDelft), HPC center/experts (GENCI, AMD, CINES, CRIANN) and industry (Safran, Ariane Group, Siemens-Gamesa).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Objectives &lt;br /&gt;
** Bring together experts in high-performance computing, applied mathematics and multi-physics CFDs&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify the technological barriers of exaflopic CFD via numerical experiments&lt;br /&gt;
** Identify industrial needs and challenges in high-performance computing&lt;br /&gt;
** Propose action plans to add to the development roadmaps of the CFD codes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 03/11/2021: First announcement of the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banniere_ECFD5_sponso.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 13/01/2022: After discussions with the participants, the '''5th Extreme CFD Workshop &amp;amp; Hackathon''' is maintained as an in-person event!  It will be also possible to attend to the plenary sessions and participate remotely to the workshop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 14/01/2022: The [[#Agenda|ECFD5 program]] is online! The plenary sessions will be announced soon!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 20/01/2022: The plenary sessions are now defined:&lt;br /&gt;
** P1 - 24/01/2022: GPU porting challenges and quantum computing, présentation machine Adastra by G. Staffelbach (CERFACS) + Presentation of the new cluster from CINES called Adastra by C. Andrieu (CINES)&lt;br /&gt;
** P2 - 25/01/2022: News, perspectives and future of GPU computing applied to CFD by A. Toure (AMD)&lt;br /&gt;
** P3 - 26/01/2022: Theory, applications and perspectives of the Lattice-Boltzmann Method by P. Boivin (M2P2)&lt;br /&gt;
** P4 - 27/01/2022: Concepts and notions of mesh adaptation by C. Dapogny (LJK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 23/04/2022: '''The ECFD5 event has now started !!''' [https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6891053385072594944| LinkedIn post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agenda ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ECFD5_program.png|text-bottom|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thematics / Mini-workshops ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mini-workshops may change and cover more or less topics. This page will be adapted according to your feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Combustion - K. Bioche, VUB  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Static and dynamic mesh adaptation - G. Balarac, LEGI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Multi-phase flows - M. Cailler, SAFRAN TECH  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Hybrid E-E/E-L two-phase flow method (M. Cailler, F. Pecquery, I. El Yamani, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High-Fidelity approach based on ACLS &amp;amp; DMA allows a reliable description of interface dynamics. For design exploration, low-CPU methods with controlled level of fidelity are required. An interesting approach to reduce CPU cost relies on an hybrid approach based on an Eulerian representation of the gas &amp;amp; and a Lagrangian description for the liquid. Objective of the ECFD5 was to explore the capability to reconstruct the interface normal on the Eulerian grid. A level-set based strategy relying on Geometric Multiple Markers Projection (Janodet et al., 2022) has been first tested showing good capabilities providing that the iso-surface distance equal 0 is captured. An alternative strategy based on the liquid volume fraction has been tested. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 3: Convergence of the interface curvature computation (G. Ghigliotti, J. Carmona, G. Balarac, G. Lartigue)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The computation of interface curvature in a level-set framework is based on the classic formula as divergence of the gradient of the levelset function. This function being computed at 2nd order, one obtains a O(0) curvature, meaning that the error does not decrease with mesh refinement.&lt;br /&gt;
We have implemented in YALES2 a strategy proposed by Emmanuel Maître and collaborators in a finite element method based on the regularization (filtering) of the level-set gradient and curvature.&lt;br /&gt;
This strategy has been tested for the simple test case of a static circular interface.&lt;br /&gt;
We used two types of filters (simple gather-scatter or bilaplacian as developed by Lola Guedot (PhD thesis 2015)) on different mesh types (split quadrilaterals, isotropic triangular mesh, unstructured triangular mesh).&lt;br /&gt;
The results are encouraging since a O(1) convergence is obtained in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
Further work is needed to tune the filter properties (amplitude and size) for different spatial resolutions and levelset &amp;quot;narrow band&amp;quot; width.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 4: Conservative two-fluid momentum transport (F. Pecquery, C. Merlin, M. Cailler, J. Carmona, V. Moureau)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Numerics - G. Lartigue, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Turbulent flows - P. Bénard, CORIA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 1: Optimization of the actuator set for several wind turbines in YALES2 (F. Houtin Mongrolle, S. Gremmo, E. Muller &amp;amp; B. Duboc)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 5: TBLE wall model for LES with pressure gradient on a simple turbomachinery geometry (M. Cizeron, N. Odier, R. Vicquelin)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Wall modeling is often used in LES to alleviate the computational cost that would be required to resolve all the length scales up to the solid boundaries of the domain. The classical way of doing it is by using an algebraic model to provide the wall friction and heat flux, with a coupling to the LES solver at the first off-wall nodes. The wall model was designed from analyzing RANS equation with strong assumptions such as planar flow, equilibrium and no pressure gradient. These assumptions are often far from true in real applications, such as turbomachinery applications, where the use of a wall model is mandatory due to the size of the calculation. During this workshop, a wall model relying on the resolution of the Thin Boundary Layer Equations (TBLE)  was studied, which had been implemented by EM2C. The addition of a pressure gradient to these equations has been conducted and tested, at first only for the 1D wall model solver, then on a 3D turbulent channel. It remains to be tested on a diffuser configuration with a real pressure gradient to quantify the effect of the new wall model. The influence of the point considered to do the coupling between the LES and the wall model (ie. its distance to the wall) has also been tested both for the TBLE and the original algebraic model, showing that coupling farther from the wall yields better results and reduces the so-called log-layer mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sub-project 6: Tools for rough wall modelling (A. Barge, S. Meynet)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compressible - L. Bricteux, UMONS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== User experience - J. Leparoux, SAFRAN TECH ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hackathon - G. Staffelbach, CERFACS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMD GPU hardware is still relatively unknown in our CFD community. This hackathon was the opportunity to deep dive into the AMD dev environment to prepare the arrival of AdAstra at CINES.  &lt;br /&gt;
Both  YALES and AVBP have been ported to the AOMP framework using ROCm 4.5 on the GRID5000 Neowise system.  &lt;br /&gt;
CPU execution posed no issues and we were able to focus on GPU Offloading using OpenMP. &lt;br /&gt;
On the YALES2 side,  a mini-app encompassing the typical YALES2 structure hierarchy and loop execution was extracted from the code to evaluate different porting strategies and on the AVBP side the current OpenACC GPU offloading was translated to OpenMP focusing on the viscosity computation kernel.  &lt;br /&gt;
We learnt that the current supported standard of OpenMP in ROCm 4.5 does not allow for direct offloading of reference values inside an derived type structure but is was possible to use aliases such as pointers or flat array copies to do the job. This should be solved with the support of OpenMP 5.0 &lt;br /&gt;
Another troublesome issues, was the lack of support for offloading of array vector operations  (ex : array(:) = 1.0 ) rendering the explicitation of the loops for these manadatory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some bugs remain and it is encouraged to use the latest compiler version when working on the porting ( the release of flang 14.0.1 saved us a lot of time as we had started with 14.0.0 ).&lt;br /&gt;
Offloading of the miniapp of YALES2 yielded a times 60 acceleration of the kernel whereas the offloading of the viscosity model in a full avbp simulation yielded an 7 times factor in performance when comparing on core to one GPU. These results are to be taken with a grain of salt but are really encouraging.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the next steps, a porting strategy for both codes will be implemented (depending on the OpenMP 5 support ) and discussions are underway with CINES and other partners so as to offer the best experience to both code's communities on AdAstra at its release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
== Communications related to ECFD5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Publications ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_3rd_edition&amp;diff=224</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 3rd edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_3rd_edition&amp;diff=224"/>
				<updated>2020-02-20T17:32:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: /* Project #4: Conservative Heat Transfers in the the Accurate Conservative Level-Set framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE: ECFD workshop, 3rd edition, 2020}}&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sponsors == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd3_sponsors.png|center|frameless|800px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Participants == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd3_participants.png|center|frameless|1000px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:lecfd3_participants_photo.jpg|center|frameless|1000px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flyer == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_flyer.pdf | Flyer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentations == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_intro.pdf | Introduction workshop]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_intro_genci.pdf | Introduction GENCI]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_avbp_roadmap_HPC.pdf | Roadmap AVBP (HPC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_yales2_roadmap.pdf | Roadmap YALES2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Booklet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_booklet_template.zip | Template]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Project achievements ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #1: Hackathon GENCI/ATOS/AMD/CERFACS on AVBP ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''C. Piechurski (GENCI), S. Jauré (ATOS), B. Pajot  (ATOS), P.-A. Harraud (AMD), P. Mohanamuraly (CERFACS), G. Staffelbach (CERFACS), J. Legaux (CERFACS)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We ported the AVBP solver to the AMD Rome system available at GENCI -TGCC ( IRENE Joliot Curie). &lt;br /&gt;
Characterisation of the application on the architecture showed a 1/3 performance dependency to bandwidth and 2/3 to compute.  &lt;br /&gt;
Strong scaling performance up to 130k cores was measured with openmpi and provided an acceleration of 75% without optimisations.  &lt;br /&gt;
Weak scaling up to 32k MPI ranks suggests that decimation of the processes by a factor 2 improves computational efficiency by up to 30%. &lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a trade off between mpi imbalance and decimation is possible if imbalance is higher than 30% to improve time to solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently Openmpi offers the best perfofrmance, intelmpi is still a bit unstable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Hackathon we also introduced colour based cache blocking using ColPack in the code in order to use OpenMP without critical sections. &lt;br /&gt;
On a 2x18 core Skylake processor the new implementation offered similar speedup using full threading versus full MPI with the best trade off being 4 MPI and 9 threads per MPI.&lt;br /&gt;
On AMD Rome, Full threading did not offer much acceleration and needs to be inversigated but 8 MPI and 16 threads per MPI seem quite promising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project1.pdf | Final presentation of project #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #2: Hackathon GENCI/ATOS/AMD/CORIA on YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''C. Piechurski (GENCI), S. Jauré (ATOS), P.-A. Harraud (AMD), P. Mohanamuraly (CERFACS), G.Lartigue (CORIA), F. Gava (CORIA), K. Bioche (CORIA), P. Begou (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this Hackaton we measured the performances of Yales2 on the AMD Epyc Rome processors.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In particular we focused on scalability and in finding the execution time dependency on memory bandwidth and cache effects.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After removing the MPI contribution, we found that there is a 49% dependency on the bandwidth, a 33% dependency on cache effects, leaving 18% on CPU frequency, prefetcing, etc.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This clearly explains the fact that, with the proper binding, using 2 half filled nodes gives a computation time that is about 50% that of 1 full node.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We also compared the performances on AMD nodes with Intel Skylake nodes on a non-reactive simulation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Our findings shows that on full nodes the two architectures gives almost equivalent performances. However, AMD seems to perform better when using half-empty nodes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the side, we realised that switching from OpenMPI to IntelMPI  and setting I_MPI_FABRICS=shm:ofa, whose equivalent is seemingly active by default for OpenMPI, divides almost by a factor 2 the time spent in MPI exchanges on Skylake nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also developed a simple profiling tool in Yales2, which will allow to measure and analyse more precisely the performances of the code with little intrusion and overhead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project2.pdf | Final presentation of project #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #3: Implementation of a secondary atomization model in YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''C. G. Guillamon (Safran Tech), L .Voivenel (Safran Tech), R. Mercier (Safran Tech)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrangian simulations, droplets are transported following a ballistic motion in an eulerian mesh. For non-reactive environments, droplets might undergo secondary atomization due to the aerodynamic interaction. In this work, we implement in YALES2 a breakup model known as Taylor-Analogy Breakup (TAB). This model is based on the analogy between a droplet and a second-order mechanical system, hence making possible to determine the breakup behaviour by means of Newton's second law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another model, the stochastic breakup model by Gorokhovski, is also suggested for future work and will be implemented in YALES2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:Ecfd3_final_project3.zip | Final presentation of project #3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #4: Conservative Heat Transfers in the the Accurate Conservative Level-Set framework ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''François Pecquery (ARIANE GROUP), Mélody Cailler (SAFRAN TECH), Romain Janodet (SAFRAN TECH/CORIA) and Vincent Moureau (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objectives of the project was to introduce conservative heat transfers in the Accurate Conservative Level-Set framework to be able to describe heat transfers and liquid dynamics in an accurate, robust and conservative manner. A Multi-Phase Transport framework relying on the conserving and level-set coherent transport of the temperature is introduced on the  Spray solver. The solution is to use the fluxes of a phase indicator that may be sharp, contrarily to the level-set. The new solver was used on a simplified test case where a liquid droplet is transported in a temperature stratified environment. Results show promising capabilities of the new framework. Next work include improvement of the transport equation stability, and of the jump condition at the interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project4.pdf | Final presentation of project #4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #5: Jet-in-crossflow par une méthode d’interface diffuse ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''T. Laroche, N. Odier, B. Cuenot (CERFACS). In collaboration with M. Pelletier, T. Schmitt, S. Ducruix (EM2C)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of fuel injection in an aircraft engine, liquid fuel is injected through a swirler, and sheared by a high-speed oxyder which destabilizes the liquid interface. This interaction induces liquid ligaments, which break up into large droplets (primary atomization), and then themselves break into small droplets (secondary atomization)&lt;br /&gt;
This project deals with the implementation of a diffuse-interface method in the massively parallel solver AVBP to represent the liquid interface destabilization during primary atomization for compressible applications. This methodology is found to be very efficient, however a control of the interface diffusion is mandatory as soon as convective effects are added. During this workshop, the methodology proposed by Chiodi and Desjardins ( ''A reformulation of the conservative level set reinitialization equation for accurate and robust simulation of complex multiphase flows'', JCP 2017) to control the interface thickness has been implemented in AVBP, and is currently under validation on a periodic liquid jet with surface tension effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project5.pdf | Final presentation of project #5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #6: Accurate numerical predicti􏴇on of vorti􏴇cal flows using AMR ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Laurent Bricteux (U. MONS)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We try to demonstrate that Eulerian method YALES2 using AMR can do a very good job to capture complex vortical flows at moderate Re=10k&lt;br /&gt;
Here we use an AMR strategy based on vorticity. We investigate the problem of vortex ring collision. We have a gain of 1000 on the numbers of elements compared &lt;br /&gt;
to a non adaptative approach. We are able to capture the transition from a very simple laminar flow to a complex turbulent flow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project6.pdf | Final presentation of project #6]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #7: Modélisation de parois pour la simulation des grandes échelles ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A. Barge(LEGI), P. Bénard(CORIA) and G. Balarac(LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We ran simulations to benchmark the Dynamic Slip Wall method from (Bose &amp;amp; Moin, PoF, 2014) that we implemented in YALES2. The performances of the method have been compared with those from the classic Log-Law and the method from (Duprat et al., PoF, 2011) on the standard cases of channel flow and periodic hills. The results from the Dynamic Slip wall showed a satisfying efficiency although its precision stays comparable to the method from Duprat et al. Also, we set up the non-stationary test case of oscillating channel flow to enrich the benchmarking with the above-mentioned methods. Finally, we started to work on the implementation of a new approach proposed by M. Gorokhovski, tests are in progress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project7.pdf | Final presentation of project #7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #8: Accurate numerical simulation of contact lines with dynamic mesh adaptation ===&lt;br /&gt;
''S. Pertant (LEGI), G. Ghigliotti (LEGI), G. Balarac (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main objective of this project was to develop a methodology to simulate contact lines on unstructured meshes. We especially wanted to get rid of mesh influence on contact line movement when the flow is driven by surface tension and the contact line close to its equilibrium position. A slight modification in the Ghost Fluid Method to apply the pressure jump has been tested and seems promising. The pressure gradient at contact line is indeed less sensitive to mesh elements for high density ratios. Furthermore, dynamic mesh adaptation has been used to simulate a 2D vapour bubble lying on a wall. Due to gravity, the two contact lines are receding until their merging and the bubble departure. The mesh remains fine to capture the contact line dynamics. As a future work, we plan to perform mesh adaptation on 3D contact line cases and to include additional physics such as contact angle imposition (already implemented but not used yet with mesh adaptation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project8.pdf | Final presentation of project #8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #9: Remeshed particle method at high Schmidt and Reynolds number ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''S. Santoso (LJK), J.-B. Lagaert (Math Orsay), G.Balarac (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We study the advection of a scalar function in turbulent flows with a multimesh method. The finite volume method is used to solve Navier-Stokes equations on an unstructured mesh (YALES2). The advection equation is solved with remeshed particle method on a cartesian mesh. In the context of parallel computing, we face a very unbalanced problem since a large number of particles are created in a very fine meshed zone. Our strategy to load-balance the problem is to give a weight to every element group which is equal to the density of particle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project9.pdf | Final presentation of project #9]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #10: Adaptive mesh refinement for turbulent premixed combustion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''W. Agostinelli, O. Dounia, , T. Jaravel, O. Vermorel (CERFACS)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of the project was to evaluate the potential of adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) for premixed combustion in unsteady systems. Three target cases were identified: a semi-vented deflagration with laminar to turbulent transition, a planar detonation wave, and a bluff-body stabilized burner subjected to thermoacoustic oscillations. The simulations were performed with AVBP and coupled to the AMR implementation of YALES2. Several metrics and remeshing criterions were developed to identify and correctly resolve both the combustion wave front and the turbulent flow. The comparison of numerical results with reference simulations showed that the main features of the physics could be recovered with a significant speed-up in term of computational cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project10.pdf | Final presentation of project #10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #11: Multiphysics coupling for wind turbine wake modeling ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''F.Houtin-Mongrolle (CORIA), B. Duboc (Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy), P. Benard (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to implement the coupling of YALES2 (flow solver, using Actuator Lines) with BHawC(Aero-Servo-Elastic solver developed in SGRE). The objective is to get an accurate prediction of the wake physics with the LES while also modeling the deformations of the wind turbine and its whole control system, which is essential to simulate a realistic behavior of the machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coupling is done by exchanging data with MPI. Several executables of BHawC (1 sequential executable per turbine) are launched together with YALES2. During the temporal loop, BHawC sends the positions and velocities of the structural nodes and impose them on the particles of the actuator lines. YALES2 calculate the forces on those particles and send them back to BHawC, and updates the flow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So far, the communications between the codes have been implemented. The simulation is correctly initialized with several turbines and the coupled code runs the temporal loop. A small simulation on 3 aligned turbines showed a good computational efficiency of this coupling. However, the timestep of YALES2 is one order of magnitude lower than what is expected by the CFL criterion, because it is now imposed by BHawC. In a future work, the proper sub-stepping will be implemented to decrease the computational cost of the simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project11.pdf | Final presentation of project #11]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #12: Stability of a semi-implicit compressible cavitation solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''H. Garg (LEGI), G. Ghigliotti (LEGI) and G. Balarac (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The compressible cavitation solver is used to simulate cavitation inception in an initially liquid flow behind an obstacle.&lt;br /&gt;
This solver is based on the implicit compressible solver, that has been modified to include a « barotropic » pressure-density relationship playing the role of an equation of state independent from the temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
While this strategy has proven to be effective for DNS simulations of the implosion of vapour bubbles, the simulation of cavitation inception in an initially liquid flow was leading to strong instabilities in the simulation shortly after the appearence of vapour.&lt;br /&gt;
The test case chosen is a flow behind a 2D cylinder.&lt;br /&gt;
The analysis of the results has shown that instabilities were correlated with very low (and even unphysically negative) values of the pressure, that were triggering negative density values leading to code instability.&lt;br /&gt;
Using limiters to ensure a positive pressure and a density within the range of the equation of state improved the stability and allowed to perform a preliminary simulation of a cavitating flow behind an obstacle.&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately instabilities appear anyways, so that the will look to the spatial discretisation schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project12.pdf | Final presentation of project #12]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #13: Validations and comparisons of Diffuse / Sharp interface methods in a structured DNS solver (Titan) ===&lt;br /&gt;
''V. Boniou (EM2C), J.M. Dupays (EM2C), M. Pelletier (EM2C), T. Schmitt (EM2C), A. Vié (EM2C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project aimed at using academic test cases to compare the sharp (incompressible) and diffuse (compressible) models. In particular, the test case of an inviscid initially elliptical oscillating droplet has been carried out.&lt;br /&gt;
The solvers features are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- incompressible VOF solver (sharp): Numerical Method: Projection Method, Interface reconstruction: VOF, Surface tension: CSF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- compressible multifluid solver (diffuse): Advection scheme: MUSCL + RK2 + minmod limiter, Surface tension: CSF. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source term is integrated with operator-splitting, and the curvature computation relies on a 2nd-order differentiation of the liquid volume fraction, which is previously smooth by filtering.&lt;br /&gt;
This test case showed good agreement on the oscillation period, while exhibiting a slight numerical diffusion in the incompressible case and a strong numerical diffusion in the compressible case.&lt;br /&gt;
In the compressible case, the use of higher-order splitting (Strang [SIAM Num. An. 1968]) has been tested, yielding no noticeable improvement. Reduction of the number of filtering iterations on the liquid volume fraction provides a slight improvement, which may indicate that a better curvature computation could participate to reduce the numerical diffusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project13.pdf | Final presentation of project #13]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #14: High Order Framework ===&lt;br /&gt;
''M. Bernard (LEGI), G. Lartigue (CORIA), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aim of this project is to extend the high order framework (HOF) in Yales2.&lt;br /&gt;
As a reminder, the HOF permits to reconstruct a point-wise quantity from the volume-averaged one, arising from classical Finite-Volume schemes, and thus to improve spatial accuracy of numerical schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the ECFD workshop #3, a dedicated solver has been created, the high order solver (hos), duplicated from the incompressible solver (ics).&lt;br /&gt;
We started activating the HOF ingredients previously developed, starting from velocity field advancement.&lt;br /&gt;
Development is still in progress, but the static Taylor-Green vortices test-case has been investigated in order to see the early improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project14.pdf | Final presentation of project #14]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #15: Validation of a fluid structure interaction case with the coupling ALE/SMS ===&lt;br /&gt;
''T. Fabbri (LEGI), G. Lartigue (CORIA), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was the validation of the Turek(2006) benchmark for fluid structure case.&lt;br /&gt;
The Structural Mechanics Solver (SMS) was already existing before the workshop, as the coupling with the Arbitrary-Lagrangian Eulerian solver.&lt;br /&gt;
However, the results were not in agreement with the case. The data compared here are the flexible part tip displacement, but also the drag and the lift integrated&lt;br /&gt;
on the cylinder and the flexible part. &lt;br /&gt;
The pure structure test cases were validated, but the forces computed for the pure fluid test cases were not satisfying. &lt;br /&gt;
The work of this week was then to improve the viscous shear computation, which implies the wall normal gradient computation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project15.pdf | Final presentation of project #15]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #16: Development of a RANS solver in YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''G. Sahut (LEGI), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA), G. Lartigue (CORIA), P. Bénard (CORIA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the accuracy of LES usually approaches the one of DNS, LES are still too time-consuming for daily use in industrial applications. In this context, we started the development of a RANS solver in YALES2. We are first only interested in the steady state of the solution. In order to remove the CFL constraint, we developed, implemented and validated an implicit projection method for the resolution of the Navier-Stokes equations without turbulence models. The method is based on the implicitation of the velocity predictor ; the Poisson equation and the correction step of the velocity are then solved and applied as in the explicit incompressible solver. We validated the method on a stationary 2D Poiseuille flow with periodic boundary conditions: the simulation runs fine for CFL and Fourier numbers which are inaccessible with the explicit incompressible solver. The advection-diffusion equation for scalars has also been implicited and will be used to add turbulence models to the new implicit incompressible solver developped during this Workshop. More complex boundary conditions will also be addressed in a near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project16.pdf | Final presentation of project #16]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #17: IMPLEMENTATION OF A COLD PLASMA MODEL IN YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''J.-M. Orlac'h (EM2C), G. Lartigue (CORIA), B. Fiorina (EM2C)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of this project was to further develop the cold plasma solver in YALES2 in order to accurately model silane nanodusty discharges. The electron temperature equation has been implemented successfully and validated against a reference plasma code. In a second step, a detailed electron kinetics has been implemented in YALES2 in order to couple the electron temperature with the charged species mass fractions. The user can now define a list of reactions whose rates depend on the electron temperature. These improvements open the path to the simulation of nanoparticle production in silane discharges using a Lagrangian description for the nanoparticles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project17.pdf | Final presentation of project #17]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #18: L’Evaporo O Maître ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;C. Nguyen Van (EM2C - Safran-Tech), J. Leparoux (Safran AE), H. Musaefendic (Safran AE), R. Mercier (Safran-Tech), B. Fiorina (EM2C)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project raises from industrial and academic needs to easily assess fuel evaporation characteristics from the simplest evaporation models to the most complex.&lt;br /&gt;
The objectives were to : &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Reintegrate recent development related to multi-components evaporation with complex transport properties have been made during the thesis of H.Larabi &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Use the full capacity of the YALES2 solver in order to make a tool addressing evaporation assessment needs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Encapsulate a test case in a python module&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Performing a state of the art of evaporation modelling in YALES2 as well as development realised, combinated with the tool desired showed that the actual framework is not fully adapted to address the objectives.&lt;br /&gt;
Creation of  a new structure ms_droplet is under development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project18.pdf | Final presentation of project #18]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #19: The Clone Wars ===&lt;br /&gt;
''H. Maldonado Colman (EM2C), C. Nguyen Van (EM2C - Safran-Tech), R. Mercier (Safran-Tech), B. Fiorina (EM2C)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this project was to increase the computation performance using virtual chemistry approach in the YALES2 solver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to reach this goal three test cases where identified:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- 1D laminar premixed flame (methane / air combustion with carbon monoxide prediction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- 2D laminar premixed bunsen flame (methane / air combustion with carbon monoxide prediction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- 3D two phase and turbulent flame (nheptane / air combustion with nitrogen monoxide prediction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several ways were explored:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Profiling of reactive simulations when using Virtual Chemistry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Effect of redundant species transport &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Effect of the size and the numbers of jacobian matrix to compute and solve&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Effect of the correction functions smoothing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions of the study are: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- String trimming and concatenation heavily affect computing performances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Redundant species transport and source terms computations has a minor impact on performances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project19.pdf | Final presentation of project #19]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #20: Stiff complex fluid simulation with YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Sam Whitmore, Yves Dubief, M2CE, University of Vermont''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective was to simulate (1) ionized gases and (2) polymer solutions in flows using YALES2. Both problems are challenging  owing to their stiff thermodynamics (1) or polymer dynamics (2). Significant gains were achieved in the implementation of the respective  models thanks to the stiff integrator library CVODE.  The plasma flow demonstrated an increase in time step of two orders of magnitude compared to previous implementation of the plasma chemistry in the variable density solver. Polymer models are notoriously prone to numerical instability. Again the use of CVODE showed equivalent  if not superior stability of the solution at a fraction of the cost of commonly employed algorithms designed to address the stiffness of the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project20.pdf | Final presentation of project #20]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #21: AVBP Dense Gases ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Paolo ERRANTE (LMFA), Alexis GIAUQUE (LMFA), Christophe CORRE (LMFA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The simulation of dense gas flows using AVBP currently relies on the Martin-Hou Equation of State (EoS) to obtain the thermodynamic variables in each grid cell from the local value of density (or specific volume v) and internal energy derived from the conservative variables. The project develops an alternative approach where thermodynamic quantities in each cell are derived from a (given) set of tabulated thermodynamic states (Look-up Table or LuT). In order to preserve flow physics, the interpolation process in the LuT tables must be performed in a consistent way (a simple bilinear interpolation on v and T for each thermodynamic variable is not sufficient). Describing Helmholtz free energy f(v,T) with a bi-quintic Hermitian polynomial function in each cell of the LuT allows to ensure a consistent interpolation process (since all thermodynamic variables are obtained by differentiating the polynomial function). During the workshop the functions needed to perform the consistent interpolation have been implemented in the real gas module. Short-term perspectives are completing the implementation, validating the development on some test-cases previously computed using MAH EoS and optimizing the implementation (in particular the strategy used to identify the position in the LuT of each local grid state). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project21.pdf | Final presentation of project #21]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #22: Numerical prediction of wind turbine wakes using AMR ===&lt;br /&gt;
''S. Zeol (UMONS)i,  P. Bénard (CORIA), G. Balarac (LEGI),  L. Bricteux (UMONS)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project considered here demonstrates the feasibility of the use of an adaptive mesh refinement method in the Eulerian finite volume code YALES2 for wind turbine wakes prediction. &lt;br /&gt;
The objective is to determinate the more effective methodology to adapt the mesh based on appropriate criterion.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider two methods : one for statistically steady flows based and one for purely unsteady flows (e.g. turbine with yaw, wind turbine with strong turbulence, inducing wake meandering)&lt;br /&gt;
Preliminary results were obtained on a testcase for which wind tunnel data are available: the NTNU blind test 1. &lt;br /&gt;
The static adaptation method applied on this case produced promising results and should eventually reduce the computational cost of this kind of simulations. &lt;br /&gt;
The dynamic adaptation method has been elaborated and some tests were performed to find the best adaptivity parameters. &lt;br /&gt;
The next step is to fully validate the methodology and consider then a more challenging test case with yaw adaptation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project22.pdf | Final presentation of project #22]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=File:Ecfd3_final_project4.pdf&amp;diff=220</id>
		<title>File:Ecfd3 final project4.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=File:Ecfd3_final_project4.pdf&amp;diff=220"/>
				<updated>2020-02-13T13:14:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_3rd_edition&amp;diff=133</id>
		<title>Ecfd:ecfd 3rd edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ecfd.coria-cfd.fr/index.php?title=Ecfd:ecfd_3rd_edition&amp;diff=133"/>
				<updated>2020-01-31T10:13:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cailler: -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;ECFD workshop, 3rd edition, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sponsors == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd3_sponsors.png|center|frameless|800px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Participants == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ecfd3_participants.png|center|frameless|1000px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flyer == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_flyer.pdf | Flyer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Presentations == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_intro.pdf | Introduction workshop]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_intro_genci.pdf | Introduction GENCI]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_avbp_roadmap_HPC.pdf | Roadmap AVBP (HPC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_yales2_roadmap.pdf | Roadmap YALES2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Booklet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[media:ecfd3_booklet_template.zip | Template]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Project achievements ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #1: Hackathon GENCI/ATOS/AMD/CERFACS on AVBP ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''C. Piechurski (GENCI), S. Jauré (ATOS), B. Pajot  (ATOS), P.-A. Harraud (AMD), P. Mohanamuraly (CERFACS), G. Staffelbach (CERFACS), J. Legaux (CERFACS)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We ported the AVBP solver to the AMD Rome system available at GENCI -TGCC ( IRENE Joliot Curie). &lt;br /&gt;
Characterisation of the application on the architecture showed a 1/3 performance dependency to bandwidth and 2/3 to compute.  &lt;br /&gt;
Strong scaling performance up to 130k cores was measured with openmpi and provided an acceleration of 75% without optimisations.  &lt;br /&gt;
Weak scaling up to 32k MPI ranks suggests that decimation of the processes by a factor 2 improves computational efficiency by up to 30%. &lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a trade off between mpi imbalance and decimation is possible if imbalance is higher than 30% to improve time to solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently Openmpi offers the best perfofrmance, intelmpi is still a bit unstable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Hackathon we also introduced colour based cache blocking using ColPack in the code in order to use OpenMP without critical sections. &lt;br /&gt;
On a 2x18 core Skylake processor the new implementation offered similar speedup using full threading versus full MPI with the best trade off being 4 MPI and 9 threads per MPI.&lt;br /&gt;
On AMD Rome, Full threading did not offer much acceleration and needs to be inversigated but 8 MPI and 16 threads per MPI seem quite promising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project1.pdf | Final presentation of project #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #2: Hackathon GENCI/ATOS/AMD/CORIA on YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''C. Piechurski (GENCI), S. Jauré (ATOS), P.-A. Harraud (AMD), P. Mohanamuraly (CERFACS), G.Lartigue (CORIA), F. Gava (CORIA), P. Begou (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project2.pdf | Final presentation of project #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #3: Implementation of a secondary atomization model in YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''C. G. Guillamon (Safran Tech), L .Voivenel (Safran Tech), R. Mercier (Safran Tech)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lagrangian simulations, droplets are transported following a ballistic motion in an eulerian mesh. For non-reactive environments, droplets might undergo secondary atomization due to the aerodynamic interaction. In this work, we implement in YALES2 a breakup model known as Taylor-Analogy Breakup (TAB). This model is based on the analogy between a droplet and a second-order mechanical system, hence making possible to determine the breakup behaviour by means of Newton's second law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another model, the stochastic breakup model by Gorokhovski, is also suggested for future work and will be implemented in YALES2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project3.pdf | Final presentation of project #3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #4: Conservative Heat Transfers in the the Accurate Conservative Level-Set framework ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project4.pdf | Final presentation of project #4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: François Pecquery, Mélody Cailler, Romain Janodet and Vincent Moureau&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objectives of the project was to introduce conservative heat transfers in the Accurate ConservativeLevel-Set framework to be able to describe heat transfers and liquid dynamics in an accurate, robust and conservative manner. A Multi-Phase Transport solver is introduced relying on the conserving and level-set coherent transport of the temperature. The solution is to use the fluxes of a phase indicator that may be sharp, contrarily to the level-set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #5: Jet-in-crossflow par une méthode d’interface diffuse ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of fuel injection in an aircraft engine, liquid fuel is injected through a swirler, and sheared by a high-speed oxyder which destabilizes the liquid interface. This interaction induces liquid ligaments, which break up into large droplets (primary atomization), and then themselves break into small droplets (secondary atomization)&lt;br /&gt;
This project deals with the implementation of a diffuse-interface method in the massively parallel solver AVBP to represent the liquid interface destabilization during primary atomization for compressible applications. This methodology is found to be very efficient, however a control of the interface diffusion is mandatory as soon as convective effects are added. During this workshop, the methodology proposed by Chiodi and Desjardins ( A reformulation of the conservative level set reinitialization equation for accurate and robust simulation of complex multiphase flows, JCP 2017) to control the interface thickness has been implemented in AVBP, and is currently under validation on a periodic liquid jet with surface tension effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project5.pdf | Final presentation of project #5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #6: Accurate numerical predicti􏴇on of vorti􏴇cal flows using AMR ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project6.pdf | Final presentation of project #6]]&lt;br /&gt;
We try to demonstrate that Eulerian method YALES2 using AMR can do a very good job to capture complex vortical flows at moderate Re=10k&lt;br /&gt;
Here we use an AMR strategy based on vorticity. We investigate the problem of vortex ring collision. We have a gain of 1000 on the numbers of elements compared &lt;br /&gt;
to a non adaptative approach. We are able to capture the transition from a very simple laminar flow to a complex turbulent flow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #7: Modélisation de parois pour la simulation des grandes échelles ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project7.pdf | Final presentation of project #7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #8: Accurate numerical simulation of contact lines with dynamic mesh adaptation ===&lt;br /&gt;
''S. Pertant (LEGI), G. Ghigliotti (LEGI), G. Balarac (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main objective of this project was to develop a methodology to simulate contact lines on unstructured meshes. We especially wanted to get rid of mesh influence on contact line movement when the flow is driven by surface tension and the contact line close to its equilibrium position. A slight modification in the Ghost Fluid Method to apply the pressure jump has been tested and seems promising. The pressure gradient at contact line is indeed less sensitive to mesh elements for high density ratios. Furthermore, dynamic mesh adaptation has been used to simulate a 2D vapour bubble lying on a wall. Due to gravity, the two contact lines are receding until their merging and the bubble departure. The mesh remains fine to capture the contact line dynamics. As a future work, we plan to perform mesh adaptation on 3D contact line cases and to include additional physics such as contact angle imposition (already implemented but not used yet with mesh adaptation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project8.pdf | Final presentation of project #8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #9: Remeshed particle method at high Schmidt and Reynolds number ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''S. Santoso (LJK), J.-B. Lagaert (Math Orsay), G.Balarac (LEGI)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We study the advection of a scalar function in turbulent flows with a multimesh method. The finite volume method is used to solve Navier-Stokes equations on an unstructured mesh (YALES2). The advection equation is solved with remeshed particle method on a cartesian mesh. In the context of parallel computing, we face a very unbalanced problem since a large number of particles are created in a very fine meshed zone. Our strategy to load-balance the problem is to give a weight to every element group which is equal to the density of particle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project9.pdf | Final presentation of project #9]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #10: Adaptive mesh refinement for turbulent premixed combustion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''W. Agostinelli, O. Dounia, , T. Jaravel, O. Vermorel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective of the project was to evaluate the potential of adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) for premixed combustion in unsteady systems. Three target cases were identified: a semi-vented deflagration with laminar to turbulent transition, a planar detonation wave, and a bluff-body stabilized burner subjected to thermoacoustic oscillations. The simulations were performed with AVBP and coupled to the AMR implementation of YALES2. Several metrics and remeshing criterions were developed to identify and correctly resolve both the combustion wave front and the turbulent flow. The comparison of numerical results with reference simulations showed that the main features of the physics could be recovered with a significant speed-up in term of computational cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project10.pdf | Final presentation of project #10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #11: Multiphysics coupling for wind turbine wake modeling ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''F.Houtin-Mongrolle (CORIA), B. Duboc (SGRE), P. Benard (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal of this project was to evaluate the coupling of YALES2 (flow solver) and BHawC(Aero-Servo-Elastic solver).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project11.pdf | Final presentation of project #11]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #12: Stability of a semi-implicit compressible cavitation solver ===&lt;br /&gt;
The compressible cavitation solver is used to simulate cavitation inception in an initially liquid flow behind an obstacle.&lt;br /&gt;
This solver is based on the implicit compressible solver, that has been modified to include a « barotropic » pressure-density relationship playing the role of an equation of state independent from the temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
While this strategy has proven to be effective for DNS simulations of the implosion of vapour bubbles, the simulation of cavitation inception in an initially liquid flow was leading to strong instabilities in the simulation shortly after the appearence of vapour.&lt;br /&gt;
The test case chosen is a flow behind a 2D cylinder.&lt;br /&gt;
The analysis of the results has shown that instabilities were correlated with very low (and even unphysically negative) values of the pressure, that were triggering negative density values leading to code instability.&lt;br /&gt;
Using limiters to ensure a positive pressure and a density within the range of the equation of state improved the stability and allowed to perform a preliminary simulation of a cavitating flow behind an obstacle.&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately instabilities appear anyways, so that the spatial discretisation is now under study, notably through upwinding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project12.pdf | Final presentation of project #12]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #13: Validations and comparisons of Diffuse / Sharp interface methods in a structured DNS solver (Titan) ===&lt;br /&gt;
''V. Boniou (EM2C), J.M. Dupays (EM2C), M. Pelletier (EM2C), T. Schmitt (EM2C), A. Vié (EM2C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project aimed at using academic test cases to compare the sharp (incompressible) and diffuse (compressible) models. In particular, the test case of an inviscid initially elliptical oscillating droplet has been carried out.&lt;br /&gt;
The solvers features are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- incompressible VOF solver (sharp): Numerical Method: Projection Method, Interface reconstruction: VOF, Surface tension: CSF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- compressible multifluid solver (diffuse): Advection scheme: MUSCL + RK2 + minmod limiter, Surface tension: CSF. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source term is integrated with operator-splitting, and the curvature computation relies on a 2nd-order differentiation of the liquid volume fraction, which is previously smooth by filtering.&lt;br /&gt;
This test case showed good agreement on the oscillation period, while exhibiting a slight numerical diffusion in the incompressible case and a strong numerical diffusion in the compressible case.&lt;br /&gt;
In the compressible case, the use of higher-order splitting (Strang [SIAM Num. An. 1968]) has been tested, yielding no noticeable improvement. Reduction of the number of filtering iterations on the liquid volume fraction provides a slight improvement, which may indicate that a better curvature computation could participate to reduce the numerical diffusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project13.pdf | Final presentation of project #13]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #14: Méthode d'ordre élevé ===&lt;br /&gt;
''M. Bernard (LEGI), G. Lartigue (CORIA), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project14.pdf | Final presentation of project #14]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #15: Utilisation d’éléments finis du second ordre dans le SMS ===&lt;br /&gt;
''T. Fabbri (LEGI), G. Lartigue (CORIA), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project15.pdf | Final presentation of project #15]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #16: Development of a RANS solver in YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''G. Sahut (LEGI), G. Balarac (LEGI), V. Moureau (CORIA), G. Lartigue (CORIA), P. Bénard (CORIA), A. Grenouilloux (CORIA)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the accuracy of LES usually approaches the one of DNS, LES are still too time-consuming for daily use in industrial applications. In this context, we started the development of a RANS solver in YALES2. We are first only interested in the steady state of the solution. In order to remove the CFL constraint, we developed, implemented and validated an implicit projection method for the resolution of the Navier-Stokes equations without turbulence models. The method is based on the implicitation of the velocity predictor ; the Poisson equation and the correction step of the velocity are then solved and applied as in the explicit incompressible solver. We validated the method on a stationary 2D Poiseuille flow with periodic boundary conditions: the simulation runs fine for CFL and Fourier numbers which are inaccessible with the explicit incompressible solver. The advection-diffusion equation for scalars has also been implicited and will be used to add turbulence models to the new implicit incompressible solver developped during this Workshop. More complex boundary conditions will also be addressed in a near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project16.pdf | Final presentation of project #16]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #17: COUPLING OF A FLUID PLASMA SOLVER WITH A LAGRANGIAN SOLVER FOR THE MODELING OF DUSTY ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project17.pdf | Final presentation of project #17]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #18: L’Evaporo O Maıtre ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project18.pdf | Final presentation of project #18]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #19: The Clone Wars ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project19.pdf | Final presentation of project #19]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #20: Stiff complex fluid simulation with YALES2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Sam Whitmore, Yves Dubief, M2CE, University of Vermont''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The objective was to simulate (1) ionized gases and (2) polymer solutions in flows using YALES2. Both problems are challenging  owing to their stiff thermodynamics (1) or polymer dynamics (2). Significant gains were achieved in the implementation of the respective  models thanks to the stiff integrator library CVODE.  The plasma flow demonstrated an increase in time step of two orders of magnitude compared to previous implementation of the plasma chemistry in the variable density solver. Polymer models are notoriously prone to numerical instability. Again the use of CVODE showed equivalent  if not superior stability of the solution at a fraction of the cost of commonly employed algorithms designed to address the stiffness of the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project20.pdf | Final presentation of project #20]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #21: AVBP Dense Gases ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project21.pdf | Final presentation of project #21]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project #22: Numerical prediction of wind turbine wakes using AMR ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[media:ecfd3_final_project22.pdf | Final presentation of project #22]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cailler</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>